Art should be explaining?

[DSF]

Yes. After all, sharks and bulls - this is not the picture. This is a kind of ordinary object or an object, but only withdrawn from their usual environment and moved to another, "with adequate infrastructure, and the only reason why is now to be called" a work of art. " I believe that the simple movement of a toilet bowl from a shop in the showroom does not make the toilet work of art. This action I called farce. But, again, the correct thing is a farce and always demanded.