|
|||||||
| English | Русский | ![]() |
Регистрация | Дневники | Справка | Пользователи | Поиск | Сообщения за день | Все разделы прочитаны |
| Costs, valuation, attribution Discuss artworks’ prices and attribution. |
| Результаты опроса: Считаете ли вы Марка Ротко новатором? | |||
| Да |
|
38 | 34.23% |
| Нет |
|
36 | 32.43% |
| Сомневаюсь |
|
26 | 23.42% |
| Ничего не знаю о Марке Ротко |
|
11 | 9.91% |
| Голосовавшие: 111. Вы ещё не голосовали в этом опросе | |||
|
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #11 |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,448 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23529
|
Yeah, with Rothko deystvitelno strange happened. Perhaps reserve was somehow Lomov? Pofantaziruem that the sellers relied on the previous sale - 72 million - and this time the expectations were 55-60 million. But after the sale was isklyuchtelnaya. "White Center" named only as "Rockefeller Rothko" - there is not only a thing was outstanding, but the history of existence peculiar. Plus caught Sheikh, as we now know, from Qatar, for which these millions - only numbers in PDA. So the purchase of 72 million might not be an occasion to raise the bar market. This may be the explanation?
And about "not selling out" - is 100%accurate? In artprayse There is a mark not communicated. It may mean not sold, but not necessarily. Soon will be a press release, we'll see. All now Solemn information appeared - still not sold, lot not sold. Who knows what was the "estimate on request"? |
|
|
|