Records Christie's

[qwerty]

Сообщение от Wladzislaw

You should not have linked these two authors. This Basquiat lyasnetsya with a crash , and the sound of the lost fragments of the states .

Probably still not. This Basquiat has a number of advantages: he is an American , little black , a drug addict and died young, such a set is no longer anybody. So he - the legend ( untwisted , of course) , and will be bought amerikosy probably always .

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от qwerty

So he - the legend (untwisted, of course)

At the age of 24 he was already on the cover The New York Times Magazine .

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky ; 2843921 "

hard to imagine Russian " enforcer " with a bag of Nala scour the New York area galleries in search doroguschego Basquiat , so you thing that 's put up for Christie's, for the sake of the amount of care to get into your account bank .

Yes fantastic picture, and do not need to wash them , then do not report to anyone .

Сообщение от bykinist; 2843681 "

Imagine the " scope " of the international scale of Western contemporary art market is to launder money

That is, do you think that this is not the real purchase, and mafia money launderer ? A Basquiat and Bacon where from? Or just buy now to sell later and thus legalize capital , only washing off - road it turns . This auction Christie's broke records for total revenue .

It was the most successful auction in the history of Christie's: total revenues were $ 691.6 million

[Сергей Дородный]

Wow , what an interesting topic ! 2x more pages are not written , and only want to argue with half board! That's what a man amounts to 100 lam doing!

Imhi :
1. Murakami did not buy for and for what " free money , free money come " (C ) ? . Yes , big boobs and big Kawainui aunt - it's chorus , but somehow mestyachkovo .
2 . Hirst in this campaign not - can not deliver this time at Christie ? . In general, I have long been pushing a cart that Hurst is not a competitor Koons ( And Pollack and Warhol also esessno ) . He plays in the same league with Murakami .
3 . Basquiat can not collapse , because He is the author of the new ( and latest ) aesthetic paternalistic , which oppresses the aesthetic patern Malevich , Picasso , Rothko ( for aesthetic precepts which mainly takes place and our zhist ) . ( About this I have recently figured out how to write thread - cart) .
4 . And why " our " money laundering ? Are engaged in a little bit of law. And there are open, and the word " diplomat " is perceived as an insult.

[Владимир Владимирович]

Сообщение от Sergei burly

new (and latest) aesthetic paternalistic

What is it?

[Wladzislaw]

Сообщение от qwerty

Probably still not.

It still has one indisputable advantage - he does not know how to draw.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Wladzislaw

, he could not draw.

He knew how to draw what are now paying tens of millions of dollars.

[bykinist]

Сообщение от Konstantin

That is, do you think that this is not the real purchase, and mafia money launderer ?

The notion that money launderers only "mafia" , as if to say better ... cartoon . )

I do not in any way deny the positive dynamics of the art market , especially given the more or less obvious , if not the objective of the investment attractiveness of the market in general. This has already been a lot written , and even the most cursory analysis seems to be said in favor of this kind of investment . Moreover, the work of art as a commodity unit , there are a number of other characteristic qualities that seem to increase its investment attractiveness. In other words , works of art , purchased /selected with " knowingly " and /or in accordance with specific investment strategy elaborated by far contribute to the preservation and /or augmentation of capital, at least on a par with the more common ( traditional ) investment instruments .

However , lately , it would be frivolous to dismiss the debate on the use of the art market ( at least in some of its segments) in order to deliberately dubious financial manipulations , including money laundering . Moreover, for example in Europe (to a greater extent than in the U.S. for example , as far as I know) , have moved from talk to action, trying to introduce all sorts of control mechanisms traditionally opaque , I would even say , actively masquerading art market.
For example , the fact that there is someone there , and the New York Times touched on this subject, speaks for itself . Here is the article where , just featured our " weight in diamonds " designer drug addict prodigy Basquiat :



P.S. This "theme " is rooted in a program called "Advancing American Art " developed by the CIA in 1947 and is funded from the state budget dollars. The fact that we are now discussing , namely the phenomenon of post-war American art ( by and large ) is a logical continuation of the propaganda of U.S. policy in the sphere of culture of the Cold War , the modified /amended under the current political economic realities. That is to say , reap the benefits of a half-century of labor.

[Сергей Дородный]

Сообщение от bykinist

The notion that money launderers only "mafia" , as if to say better ... cartoon . )



However , lately , it would be frivolous to dismiss the debate on the use of the art market ( at least in some of its segments) in order to deliberately dubious financial manipulations , including money laundering . Moreover, for example in Europe (to a greater extent than in the U.S. for example , as far as I know) , have moved from talk to action, trying to introduce all sorts of control mechanisms traditionally opaque , I would even say , actively masquerading art market.

Free capital (liquidity <! - ~ 5 ~ -> ) is concentrated in the hands of today financiers - they wash and then nothing.
And the strange way of laundered - insertion in advance investistrumenty questionable . And if tomorrow will open that the king is naked ? Is not it easier to invest in something that is considered reliable? ( Blue chips <! - ~ 6 ~ -> ) .
But here with the analysis - that all Hurst slows down growth (which is true ) , but what it should have been , chose a Hirst - and washed to health . No, menzhuyutsya guys with Hudson , who was not Herstushka .

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Sergei burly ; 2844631 "

And a strange way of laundered - insertion in advance investistrumenty questionable .

In my opinion , talking about " money laundering " on the purchase of works of art - it's a very very narrow-minded nonsense people away from the topic, trying to understand their umishkom and somehow himself and also explain why these " bourgeois buy daub for such denzhischi ".