A.Gritsay

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от camertus; 2575501 "

I also have a sketch with questionable signatures

You know , this is unlikely to Gritsay .
The reflection of clouds come out to us as well-known tiger in the painting of Salvador Dali ?
To Alexis could not figure out how to make the dark part of the reflection , that it was not flat , withered and loose ?
And not to deal with silhouettes of trees on top?
He certainly did not Levitan and Zhukovsky, but the unit " devyatitonnoy " system of tone ( three tones - light , three - partial shade , three - shadow ) owned quite think of anything .

[camertus]

agree, the issues are.
So have me.
But focused on counterfeiting are not talking, the work was acquired can say nothing.
but on the whole not a bad thing, to the same signature in the crude, though very far from the standard.
I can throw in a personal photo of better quality and without perspective.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от camertus

focused on counterfeiting are not talking

It is clear.

Just oversubscribed frankly unfinished sketch.

And who signed it, was hardly as unfinished.

[camertus]

just not clear to whom it should be done.
Thing all the same non-zero level, full-scale.
Commerce does not smell (it went for 1,000 rubles).
Or is it a bad sign sketch Grits are wet?