A.Gritsay
 

Dear friends!
I have a sketch, even quite cute.

There is a signature "A.Gritsay." Prompt please the layman, it Gritsay

or not, and if Gritsay, then which one?
Study - oil on cardboard 24h35sm.

Thank you in advance for your help!

Well, if it's Alexis Gritsay , he was very drunk .
But it seems to be that does not sin - so to get drunk as a skunk , and then start writing the " sketch" .

And so that's the same " wafers " the trees he never meant .
Not to mention about his short fence, the execution of which gives the artist, of course, the bold , but not exactly Grits .

agree, it's not Gritsay . Although I also have a sketch with questionable signatures. I decided to put it on the overall consideration. I personally think he just owned Gritsai , although the signature is very strange , and made ​​on - wet . Size things around 20x30 , cardboard. It would be interesting to hear the views

You know , this is unlikely to Gritsay .
The reflection of clouds come out to us as well-known tiger in the painting of Salvador Dali ?
To Alexis could not figure out how to make the dark part of the reflection , that it was not flat , withered and loose ?
And not to deal with silhouettes of trees on top?
He certainly did not Levitan and Zhukovsky, but the unit " devyatitonnoy " system of tone ( three tones - light , three - partial shade , three - shadow ) owned quite think of anything .

agree, the issues are.
So have me.
But focused on counterfeiting are not talking, the work was acquired can say nothing.
but on the whole not a bad thing, to the same signature in the crude, though very far from the standard.
I can throw in a personal photo of better quality and without perspective.

It is clear.

Just oversubscribed frankly unfinished sketch.

And who signed it, was hardly as unfinished.

just not clear to whom it should be done.
Thing all the same non-zero level, full-scale.
Commerce does not smell (it went for 1,000 rubles).
Or is it a bad sign sketch Grits are wet?