Pyotr Konchalovsky

[Eriksson]

Originally Posted by Eugene

The Russian Museum has a collection of work. (1910-1912gg).

And what? 'll Show! "

[Евгений]

Originally Posted by Eriksson

And what? 'll Show! "

1.Podnos and ovoschi.73h92sm. (1910).
2.Gladiolusy and gloksinii.143h121 see (1911 (2?))
-------------------------------------------------- ---
There is a fund PP Konchalovsky. (They solved all the questions on the attribution of paintings PP Konchalovsky)
http://www.pkonchalovsky.ru/a_found.html
--------------------------------------------
By topic: Pyotr Konchalovsky Foundation - examination of works http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=815

[Eriksson]

Thank you very much!

However, whether this should be so understood that the attribution of works Konchalovsky - exclusive monopoly of the Fund's name? As far as I know, at Sotheby's with the Foundation for K. contract under which the Fund guarantees the authenticity of all works sold by auction. And as is the case in other auction houses?

[Евгений]

Eriksson The signatures on the first picture P. Konchalovskiy, the second: P. Kontchalovsky. (I read your clarification of "Peter Konchilovsky)

Originally Posted by Eriksson

the attribution of works Konchalovsky - exclusive monopoly of the Fund's name?

Without the certificate of stock, my opinion, buying the work of Pyotr Konchalovsky no sense. (For just investors and novice collectors).

[Eriksson]

Originally Posted by Eugene

Eriksson, Yes, the signature on the first picture P. Konchalovskiy, the second: P. Kontchalovsky. (I read your clarification of Peter)

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]
Without the certificate of stock, my opinion, buying the work of Pyotr Konchalovsky does not make sense.

And sell?

[Евгений]

Originally Posted by Eriksson

And to sell?

Roulette, who will buy .. (a lot of fakes, even SodBi. On the subject http://www.pkonchalovsky.com/a_false.html).

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Eriksson

in what period Konchalovsky signed his work thus: "Petr Konchalovsky"

The first time I hear about such writing.

[Евгений]

Eriksson, I looked and early and later works such signature no.
We VD Solov'ev, signature of Russian artists, either.

[Eriksson]

Originally Posted by Eugene

Eriksson, I looked and early and later works such signature no.
We VD Solov'ev, signature of Russian artists, too, is no.

Eugene! Thank you for your promptness!
I too was looking for and just as you did not find, at least until ...
However, if there is no specimen signatures Soloviev, it is not oznachet that the artist could not, in principle, so to sign his work, is not it?
Is it always attribution is based on the known samples of the signature /initials? And if the artist had to sign a whim work a little differently?

[Евгений]

Originally Posted by Eriksson

is always whether the attribution is based on the known samples of the signature /initials?

No, the signature is not a basis for the attribution of the picture, but Konchalovsky (given the cost of works), it is necessary to dealing with professionals and experts Stock Konchalovsky. (If you have the slightest doubts about the authenticity of the picture).