He died Lucien Freud

[Кирилл Сызранский]

iside, " criticism is obviously more powerful works of the artist ," so even with the worldwide fame /recognition of some of his colleague from Stargorod or Shmarovki - old story.
Remember this topic [/URL]?
There I gave an example " guard coats Pavarotti discussed ".
 > > >

[iside]

Cyril Syzran, yes, I remember. >

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 1718673"

" criticism of works of the artist clearly stronger " so even with the worldwide fame /recognition of some of his colleague from Stargorod or Shmarovki - a long history

As can be seen from my personal experience , this practice is international. They (x -ki ) love rally in grupki , where more or less of each other and do not irritate the start gnobit others ( not in the group) , back or face. The one gallery owner (ex- collector ), for which I invented the name, told me in shock , as it started to go and see the artists and promoting their work, released a rather dirty comments about his colleagues, citing the fact that they just say something artists and the art of better understanding . And as with almost all >

Can you imagine what I had advised >

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Guriev , Igor ; 1718621"

For example, I wonder how it ugrebische

explains :
Long, creative life. entirely devoted to art .
even in terms of the kondovogo realiizma many of his works , his great ( realism) samples.
so this is your personal ( and private subjective ) perception idiosinkraziticheskoe - nothing can be done ...
And he sculpts the shape perfectly , and the color - tone on the spot .. But if you mean the lack of photographic portrait likeness , so the fact the artist is an artist to write through their individual ( well, maybe idiosinkraziticheskoe ) perception .
Your epithets too harsh (IMHO ) .. Can you change your mind and " take back " ( c) ?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA; 1719061"

even from the standpoint of the kondovogo realiizma many of his works , the magnificent it ( realism) samples .

Brodsky and Laktionov much better. Well , simply because they are at least the artists (though specific, and Comrade LI Freud - DID NOT AN ARTIST ).
Not to mention the Comrade . Menzel, Zorn and Repin .

Among the Jewish artists in general almost did things big . Well , unless Comrade . Pissarro and Falk.

They are given the gift of words , but with plastic gift of this warm my favorite people - the discord , frankly .
And the sad example of a disaster - attempts of some L. Freud to start painting again confirms this.

Current does not talk to me of Modigliani and Chagall. This - not artists , it's clever graphics, pretending to be painters.

[Ika-Ika]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Among the Jewish artists in general almost did things big.
Well, unless Comrade.
Pissarro and Falk.

Cezanne, Levitan.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Ika-Ika

Cezanne, Levitan.

A Cezanne something to do with it?


What to Levitan, then, of course, dear artist, a great colorist, but he did build up a picture but could not.

Added after 6 minutes

Сообщение от fross

The opinion of the artist in the criticism of the work obviously stronger artist can not but wonder at least

Theorists pancake.
Opinion , therefore, the artist Alexander Benois relatively larger than he is, artists can not go it does not cause ?

Actually, I really like the tongue-tied style Comrade . Fross .
Something in it.

[Ika-Ika]

Сообщение от Guriev , Igor ; 1719481"

A Cezanne something to do with it ?

While . And Levitan did not even have a picture , there's more , he has little tassels were to express what hotel.Mimo this work in the Tretyakov Gallery prohodyat.Eto all a very good job and task - then perhaps he was and did not put a picture , write . He expressed his complex chuvstva.Ego so Savrasov taught.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от fross"

The opinion of the artist in the criticism of the work obviously stronger artist can not but wonder at least

Tochnyak . For example, Alpatov was also an artist .
And the art historian Alexander Benois, was also an artist and critic who is very cool nor falling .
However, I would not call Benoit best artist of all time , though , of course, a great artist .

Just the one who waves the brush is usually better to understand something in the technique of painting than an outsider .

That I know of his fellow art historians, for instance, have studied at least in art school.

There are a few exceptions, but they are few, small.

[zarajara]

Сообщение от Guriev , Igor

Just the one who waves the brush is usually better to understand something in the technique of painting than an outsider .

It's not entirely true, or rather is not. An artist can better see how this is done, but "knows best" - is too strong a word.
Critics generally (we have anyway) learn to draw , they have a program that is included . Many of the draw. Many critics of the artists . In general, if the analyst takes precedence over feelings and emotions , art is preferable to painting.
 "Grand Master ", " a major figure in the art" and "an artist that I like " - not always the same . Objectivity in assessments is not possible, but it should at least try .
The right of the artist ( as nehudozhnika ) speak about any works it is not disputed , but not in " dead artist ."

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Ika-Ika

Cezanne, Levitan.

Ika-Ika, Cezanne was not a Jew.