Iconography

[Марина13]

Very nicely written, and written for the church?

If you still have a super restore.

[redbor]

Good icon.
Subscriptions icon Gurkin-infrequent thing.

Sorry for bad pictures - not be seen podisi of the branches, nor inscription the name of the icon, and generally need a good photo.
 
The icon is displayed on any subject?
Rate?

Restore nothing else, the author's paintings in conservation.

[Игорь Гурьев]

An interesting painting.


To hard stamp on every Bolesta

Infant Panteleimon we have a healer.


(M.TS.).

[Любознательный]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Interesting painting.

Agreed.
Painting.
Religious.

It seems to me there is a difference between religious painting and iconography. In Orthodoxy.

"The Appearance of Christ to the people" no one relates to the iconography. The Church does not want to send this picture of THG to the temple.

Your opinion experts.

[redbor]

Unlike paintings of icons - simple.
Important: a name written on the icon pictured saint (this name and the icon sanctified), or a holiday or other event, known from Scripture or tradition.
 There are many paintings, which were written with the icon.
For example, Ivanov The Appearance of Christ to Mary Magdalene.
Or Raphael - Madonna of the chair.
 Here, no picture and no picture, and icon Panteleimon.
What can get by halo of a saint and the inscription of his name.

[Pecheneg]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

This thing - poluikona, semi-religious paintings

How's that??
This does not happen ....

There are icons and there are paintings on religious themes ...

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Pecheneg

What's that??
This does not happen ....

There are icons and there are paintings on religious themes ...

Does not happen, but it happens.

In the early 20 th century.

[gran]

http://www.mastericonlogos.ru/Public...na&Kartina.php

[redbor]

Whatever the opinion, and fantasy, clearly defined since the period of the victory over iconoclasm:
image of the Holy Face with inscription of his name - is an icon.
 Other questions have been - on the techniques of writing styles,
of canonicity or uncanonical individual icons or icon painting schools. But the very notion of the icon-opredelenot accurately.
With a portrait of confusion is impossible.
 Shl. It is interesting to go back to an icon placed in the subject. Look at the signature Gurkin
It seems the author of threads that got it wrong with the sale or purchase.

[Любознательный]

Сообщение от redbor

Whatever the opinion, and fantasy, clearly defined since the period of the victory over iconoclasm:
image of the Holy Face with inscription of his name - is an icon.
 Other questions have been - on the techniques of writing styles,
of canonicity or uncanonical individual icons or icon painting schools. But the very notion of the icon-opredelenot accurately.
With a portrait of confusion is impossible.
 Shl. It is interesting to go back to an icon placed in the subject. Look at the signature Gurkin
It seems the author of threads that got it wrong with the sale or purchase.

However, I have a different opinion.
I am - not an artist, but a halo I can do with a compass, and be able to inscribe the name of a saint. Else (in my opinion - most importantly) I can only make a well-known proverb: with images cucumber, full stops and commas.
From your point of view - my spotting immediately becomes bound icon.
From what I have to agree, well, I can not.

No wonder I clarified my question a note: "In Orthodoxy".
It seems to me, the image on the holy icon must correspond primarily to the canon.
Interpretation of the artist the image of man (even holy) - it is painting. In some cases - the religious. In some cases - anti-religious.
Painting, rather than icons, it eslt not subject to the influence of instruction on even the icon-painting, not to mention obyazatetelnosti iconographer for instruction, approved by the Synod in the prerevolutionary Russia. In those days, everything (including artists) are sufficiently been religiously educated (system). Now - all the pieces. Unfortunately.

P.S. With regards to the picture provided, then a decent photo as it was not, or not. On the investigation of a signature may be a question?