What distinguishes the true artist from not present?

[Moriakoff]

Thank you for your attention ... As to the 5P. Probably a little nervous, missed, to be generous ...)) Now on.
Objection to the best genetics are not prinimayu.Chelovek should be healthy in every sense ... agree, otherwise it simply will not be able to live and create ... About Van Gogh can not say anything because in the biographical descriptions, nowhere provides specific medical documentation about his health ... And on there, sorry, and the court no ...
I regret that I did not understand the irony regarding the fact that an artist should not be quite lively ...)) Although some truth there, yet, there is ...
Oh ... these lovely "naive" artists ... Some people like them, someone no-matter of time and fashion. And who told you that they do not know how to draw?
The question of the real-unreal artist highly disputable ... You can talk for centuries ...)) But, sorry, you and the logical conclusion ... the need to submit, feel, look at this creature called "a true artist." Therefore I presented these punkty.Grubovato ... but at least something ... Do not agree - imagine your own!
After a group of people in a specific place at a particular time and under certain circumstances, may find the truth and to articulate their thoughts in general, fuzzy, and specifically. To anyone reading it could say: This artist is something something ... that is, and-then ...
Let these items will be more, but they will give the opportunity to present configuration ... Or am I wrong?

[Артём]

Сообщение от Moriakoff

About Van Gogh can not say anything because in the biographical descriptions, nowhere provides specific medical documentation about his health ... And on there, sorry, and the court is not ...

It is unlikely that anyone interested in digging into med.kartochkah, for example, AM Gritsaya or Giovanni Boldini, and you do not know about their health. But the health of Van Gogh's talking. About this we read, watch movies - it was a weak health. So the question of Peter in order.
And the time to do with it! This artist lives outside of time. He was more interested in his own "rod", his conscience by which he talks to God!

[Moriakoff]

Thanks, Artem, that responded ... But, unfortunately, nowhere (in the text of the discussion) I have not seen the specifics, but my only criticism of phrases .. Of course the genius should be dignified, but not to that extent .. Say something more specific, and not about talking with God ... And yet you think tell the story.
 I wrote the work entitled "Lilith the first wife of Adam." Written long ago, and posted on one of the art forums recently ... Well, everything is as usual: like-dislike ... And here comes a Jew, wrote DELUSION, iostavlyaet link to a page, they say come in ... ... I go sit two Chela, one prays (it was Saturday) I asked: "Boys, what's the matter?"
Second, the interpreter answered: Hoy, picture, nevertheless, we liked, but the description-bullshit!
Well I: And what is the second silent?
Tolmach: He's a great expert on Judaism, but pray, answer later ...
Me: Yes, he should at least pray for life, but really because "traversed", explain the reasons or give a link to the page of this "genius", where I was able to grasp ..
But imagine, so do not respond ... The next day, went into a genius, said that it was ironic that without a teacher I vseravno not understand (the roof picks) and was gone ...
Why am I all that? Yes to what going on, thinking that'll get on "templates" called "real artist", poshyu suit, but to my example ... Suddenly fit!
(With tears in his eyes) Yes, apparently, not destiny!
 "And he went through the burning sun ..."
By the way, if anyone can find lekalki to "real artist" or better "genius", come to your blog, I'll try to be happy!

[NATA NOVA]