|
|||||||
| English | Русский | ![]() |
Регистрация | Дневники | Справка | Пользователи | Поиск | Сообщения за день | Все разделы прочитаны |
|
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
|
|
Язык оригинала: Русский #2 |
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 15.03.2009
Сообщений: 2,264
Спасибо: 1,961
Поблагодарили 3,561 раз(а) в 765 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 29
Репутация: 4950
|
In the evaluation of works of art, regardless of the style and direction, the main criterion is talent.
For people immersed in the art, talent is absolutely objective and understandable at a glance the quality, this is the criterion by which to determine the "present-not present", and after that go all the other estimates. A poorly drawn and considered a masterpiece "-there is no such. |
|
|
|
| Опции темы | |
| Опции просмотра | |
|
|
Похожие темы
|
||||
| Тема | Автор | Разделы | Ответов | Последние сообщения |
| Attribution and evaluation of paintings | Runar | Costs, valuation, attribution | 1 | 25.03.2010 10:31 |
| Assessment, the attribution of paintings Bodarevsky | ФАЛЕСИК | Costs, valuation, attribution | 10 | 12.02.2010 17:14 |
| Help attribution of the author of paintings | artman | Costs, valuation, attribution | 18 | 13.12.2009 13:59 |
| Baroque, the attribution of paintings | Alex82 | Costs, valuation, attribution | 2 | 03.12.2009 18:20 |
| Help in the attribution of paintings | Бирюза | Costs, valuation, attribution | 9 | 25.11.2009 00:27 |