Pre-auction display at Sotheby's History Museum

[LCR]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

I do like many artists, all are not listed.

For example, Giorgio de Chirico, Giovanni Bellini, Gentile Bellini, Masaccio, Duccio, Giotto, Botticelli, Velázquez, Carreño de Miranda Murillo, Zurbaran, Titian, Veronese, Giorgione, Tintoretto, El Greco, Poussin, Lorrain, Lenena (Louis and Mathieu) Georges de Latour, Larzhirera, Watteau, Guardi, Chardin, Levitsky, Khrutsky, Soroka, Venetsianov, Reynolds, Levitan, Sapunov, P. Kuznetsov, VP Utkin, V. Borisov-Musatov, Munch, Cezanne, Courbet, Monet, Manet , Sisley, Braque, Matisse, Derain, Vlaminck, Pehshteyna, Kirchner, Schmidt-Rottluff, Stozharau and hundreds of other three.

From what you and congratulate

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Here Schiele, Larionova, Klee, Kandinsky and others - can not stand.

I express my deep condolences

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от LCR

I express my deep condolences

But whether it truly ?

From there your heart is it to my soul?

What are you a little of the Brotherhood of St. Gerard. John cleaned up?

Never heard of him?

Preotmenneyshy artist.

I have a lot of people I knew and many I love.

[LCR]

Update: Today I was accused of personal mail that I pull on Gudiashvili on vnehudozhestvennym reasons.

Strongly affirm that the above reasons (it does not matter what their nature) did not affect the view which I have long made themselves about this artist, one of the most disgusting with all that I know.

To summarize: I'm bad about Gudiashvili solely because they believe that its products - all, without exception - are vulgar, illiterate scribble.
I hope I have clearly formulated their opinion? Well, that's nice

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от LCR

... on vnehudozhestvennym reasons.

That's interesting.
Vladimir Davidovich died in July 1980 at the age of 84 years.
"Vnehudozhestvennye reasons"?

[LCR]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

That's interesting.
Vladimir Davidovich died in July 1980 at the age of 84 years.
"Vnehudozhestvennye reasons"? <!--~ A ~-->

No, vnehudozhestveennyh claims to "Vladimir D." I do not have - I have chicken, he did not steal, twos in the school I did not put, without returning the money did not hold, in general, it is completely clean to me.
Oh, do not deal with it in painting - everything would be in a perfect manner

But imagine that I could have such claims to the people who it, for example, expose, or write books about him, or anything else like that, that is hyping this iso-filth, theoretically, such nalzya deleted, right?

However, as I just wrote to my opponent these parts, from all the artists that they deal with hypothetical people, I recall only negative about Gudiashvili, and other "race-horses" from their stables rather praise, some even very active.

In my opinion, it is quite clearly shows that in this case I'm not trying to destroy someone's "small business" (although if he is hurt, will not cry), and think aesthetic categories

I think that this can stop.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от LCR

I withdraw the negative only Gudiashvili,

I do not understand the nature of your denial.

For example, the Iranian miniature you like about it?

Or, say, Sudeikin?

By Otto Dix?

[LCR]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

I'm not understand the nature of your denial.

For example, the Iranian miniature you like about it?

Or, say, Sudeikin?

By Otto Dix?

Persian miniature I really love (but shit Gudiashvili not have to do with it), to Sudeikin reacted with goodwill, Dix did not like (but do not mix with the dirt just do not watch)

Here, the questions answered.
I hope that now everything is clear for you

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

I do not understand the nature of your denial.

And I do not understand the nature of his ascension. example ... What can you do .. ) "There are many in this world, Horatio ..."

[Синица]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

And I do not understand the nature of his ascension. example ...

Nature may be at least two (together or separately):
1. Individual taste
2. Commercial Project - Producing someone collections.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

And I do not understand the nature of his ascension.

It's simple: the artist who created his own world of images, as they say.