Вернуться   Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство > English forum > Investing in Art
 English | Русский Forum ARTinvestment.RU RSS Регистрация Дневники Справка Сообщество Сообщения за день Поиск

Investing in Art Share your opinion about the profitability of investments.

 
 
Опции темы Опции просмотра
Старый 20.02.2010, 11:17 Язык оригинала: Русский       #11
Бывалый
 
Аватар для Причал
 
Регистрация: 10.02.2010
Сообщений: 470
Спасибо: 513
Поблагодарили 927 раз(а) в 324 сообщениях
Репутация: 1854
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Marta Посмотреть сообщение
Yes, earlier in our galleries in practice to drop the price, not placing a known artist. Even now, there is one such gallery, which may surprise so. Wildness, of course, but very few buyers, and hence the methods - not to miss!
And, now understood.
We also have only one.
And it all quite funny - come to them artists, people engaged in them there A gallery-wide issues explains that they had improperly low prices and have raised. Well, they put a little more. And then the lady actually engaged in selling price decreases (up to reality, and sometimes even higher than it would have sold elsewhere) and often the authors notifies a post-factum .
As a result, are not happy with it all:
"Politician" picture - a violation of his instructions.
Queen - the fact that it sells, and it alone assaults from all sides.
And the artist - because he got less than he could, but more than he wanted.

Added after 9 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от Veronic Посмотреть сообщение
And now you can imagine a situation that the gallery owner does not own the full information on prices of artist's paintings. Today the price alone, but tomorrow rose. The artist held exhibitions, including international. And gallery owners think that the artist is still worth 300 dollars.
We had such, so I speak from personal experience. Even after the demonstration galeristke facts on more expensive sales, she chose to stay with her opinion. Naturally we do not work with this gallery, and nothing at the same time not lose.
Citizens of Karl Marx in the issue of pricing yet no one managed to cancel .
And according to Karl Marx - "price - a product of non-resistance to the parties."
And, as gallery owners can not force you to sell paintings cheaper, and you can not gallery owners to take them more expensive.
In his gallery when he decides that to his advantage, and what is not. He can not take your work for you are willing to price. It may take, but did not recommend (passively or actively) to its customers. And you can decide that cooperation is necessary or not.
And sales in other cities or countries, I personally was not convinced of anything. I have pictures in their region to trade. And your right to sell them there where profitable to you.
So what argument I do not understand.




Последний раз редактировалось Причал; 20.02.2010 в 11:27. Причина: Добавлено сообщение
Причал вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 2 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Причал за это полезное сообщение:
AlexanderG (20.02.2010), Peter (21.02.2010)
 


Ваши права в разделе
Вы не можете создавать новые темы
Вы не можете отвечать в темах
Вы не можете прикреплять вложения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения

BB коды Вкл.
Смайлы Вкл.
[IMG] код Вкл.
HTML код Выкл.

Быстрый переход

Похожие темы
Тема Автор Разделы Ответов Последние сообщения
According to Christie's worst for the art market behind LCR Auctions 2 17.06.2009 10:12
Perhaps a portrait of Boris Pasternak раскатов Appraisal 2 10.04.2009 00:21
Came out a new study art market Самвел Exhibitions and events 0 22.03.2009 19:13
Is it possible to identify the author? komend Costs, valuation, attribution 0 05.03.2009 01:08
Traces again take us back, perhaps in the Caucasus раскатов Costs, valuation, attribution 1 18.01.2009 15:35




Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 11:06.
Telegram - Обратная связь - Обработка персональных данных - Архив - Вверх


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot