How to unleash the artist

[sss]

Сообщение от Samvel

Occupation artist is fundamentally different from other professions, are completely different understanding about life and death.
... Why is there such artists as Filonov, Bakst, why not by producer as Paradjanov, or Tarkovsky, theatergoers as Stanislavsky, Meerhold, poets like Mandelstam and Brodsky. Wash Brodsky said .. \ Empire gave rise to culture and democracy paper. There were cultural people, but people of culture are no more.

I think you idealize the image of the artist. Misunderstood genius with a bow at the neck - a literary cliche - here - the underestimation of dealer work. Contemporary artist - in part, is also a pragmatic businessman, if he is voluntarily involved in a game, and this quality has no relation to the presence of talent or lack thereof. There are artists need dealers intentionally. Dealer, know nothing about art, greedy, do not care relating to the artist, thinking only of the super-profits - also a literary cliche. As artists, dealers may be different. Some people understand their work - so, while others - syak, some are more professional, the second - less. A good dealer - this, too, talent. The question is only to the artist and the dealer match.

Your outrage at the present lack of such variables as: M., Brodsky, Paradjanov, Tarkovsky (transfer sounds like conversion promoted brands, probably, so it is) is quite understandable, but it has at least one hundred and contexts. You ask a difficult question in anticipation of an easy answer.
There are no people on its effect on mass consciousness? The quality of talent? Or address the question of internal or external captivity? The question of political structure? Personal predilections? Generational change? Etc.
First, all the above - is the quintessence, defined after
time. Our time should be yesterday to identify their heroes, they exist.
If Tarkovsky, Paradjanov, Brodsky on your list, do not accidentally snatched the names, I note that even with Tarkovsky Paradzhanov can be put in one number only on the basis of availability and in addition, and another distinct identities of talent. By the force of impact on the development of cinematic language, they are not equivalent.
Today is Herman, Zvyagintsev (to the question of the impact of Tarkovsky), Konevsky, yes, indeed, a lot of names. Ioseliani, which in Soviet times did a wonderful movie, and while in the harsh clutches of capitalism, still manages to make masterpieces.
With regards to Brodsky, I have long believed that Pasternak Russian poetry and over, until the smart people are not stuck my nose in Nekrasov.
Ya Satunovsky, Sokovnin ... do you think their poetry is less poetry than in Brodsky's poetry? No, they just work in other language environments. Brodsky - a literary language, these - often with conversational speech. But this is no less talented, but with regards to the development of poetry in general, perhaps more significant.

I apologize for some categorical.