Interaction of trash and glamor of the conflict means of their identity and dekdekonstruktsiyu latter. Glamor acquires features typical trash: awkwardness, aggression, marginality. At the same time, the trash makes extensive use of the poetics of glamor, ironically over her and sabotaging her.
Originating in the media the last quarter century, trash and glamor quickly turned into codes of visual culture. Therefore it seems logical appearance of trash-glamorous, their hybrids in contemporary art. His images are taken from the photographic or cinematic content that defines their non-picturesque aestheticism.
"After talking about aestheticism in pictures can only be ambiguous: when the picture turns into a painting, that is, the composition or visual substance treated or deliberately sculpted, it does so either in order to identify itself as art (as in piktoralnoy photos early 20 th century ), or in order to impress the audience something more subtle and complex than is possible with other connotative techniques ... "(Roland Barthes. The photographic message. Aestheticism)
Historically, that the strength of realistic art has always been his psychology, allows the artist to convey something hidden and captivate the viewer's attention to the brink of surface perception. But the problem is that it is impossible to determine exactly - where is this line. It would seem, with the return of interest in figurative to revive traditional forms of creating images, but the "wonderful world of art, academic art, some mysterious science, speculative and regulated, irretrievably gone forever. In our modern artistic life searching and collecting the daily material and its subsequent presentation by the artist in a biographical or confessional form is irrelevant. It was replaced by a healthy interest in photography and medial - a product of artistic processing of which is the trash-glamor.
Among the various aspects of the return to figurative art in the context of thrash glamor should emphasize the new nature of the interaction of the artist with the means of mass communication, the use of canons and structures of academic art, along with tools borrowed from computer graphics.
One of the most striking examples of the new figurative art is D. Shorin, who in his writings often refers to the method of "kroppinga", which makes his pictures at the same time realistic and abstract. The viewer is given an opportunity to "read" the subject of his paintings. Therefore, carefully drawn in the foreground of the hand or a tiny toy car in the corner of the picture are important for general understanding of not less than the portraits of the characters. Composition of his cinematic work, they plot, reminiscent of a close-up movies.
Cinematographic and images of "Flowers of Evil" Peter Aksenova. His works are panoramic and are based on quite specific historical material: the outlook of the heroes of the film "Death of the Gods" by Luchino Visconti. However, this seeming documentary deliberately provokes the viewer to have a hidden sense in them the story, think about the fact that everything we see, sooner or later turns into its opposite. The main theme of the project can be considered an illusion of beauty and a premonition of death. At the same time, photographers, experimenting in the field of trash-glamorous, believe they should do a survey, that it "has never published a glossy publication of the bourgeois. Therefore Natalia happy in his project "UltiMate" neglected classic canons of journalistic photography. Deliberately careless survey suggests that the author does not impose his or her attitude to the subject. The literal translation of the word UltiMate - "final, final, absolute." But therein lies another word, mate, which translates as "female (male). Ironically on stereotypes of female sexuality, Natalia Lucky tries to understand what "hidden" in those whom she takes off.
http://www.rusiskusstvo.ru/exhibitions/moscow/a1274/