He died Lucien Freud

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

I'm just not clear what it is you it is not clear.

What is not clear to me I had already formulated in your message. Engage in dialogue with the same person, which in addition to the phrase "I was just not clear what it is you it is not clear" does not sign, I think it pointless.

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Of course, not demand.
Not least because it is not "position", and brilliant text, live speech, charming and intelligent.
As if thinking aloud.
I love the genre.

Guriev, Igor, that your text contains such contradictions, it loses all meaning. If, as you say, fabosch «muses" (with which I agree), that is, commits an act at the base, which is thinking, he theorizes. A theory consists of propositions. You see, without thinking of the provisions can not, even "as if thinking aloud." I do not know of such a genre in which "as if thinking aloud," but it does not reflect at all.

And then, if the text contains provisions (yet), which must be taken for granted that text. It is an opportunity to put questions to the text, refer it to the scientific (self Saboya of course, to the extent that we can talk about art criticism as a science). A clarification - it is a prerequisite for understanding the text (especially a claim to it to be at least thinking). So, if I put questions to the text fabosch but also sought clarification on some of his assertions, that by itself this fact speaks about? The fact that I want to start to understand that he wrote fabosch, and only then decide whether there is in this text, it is worthy of excellent epithets. "Brilliant," this "living speech" will be only when it appears the semantic clarity. And in this case it appears without explanation and clarification of the author.

"Brilliant" can only be called the text, which has sufficient clarity to his understanding, and not a "fascinating" collection of "smart" words. And if you, Guriev, Igor, consider this text is a brilliant (perfect), then you should not be difficult to explain his point in two or three sentences. Only the very essence!

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Yes, this is one of the best texts that I read here.
They are here quite a few thousands, of course.

I did not ask you to evaluate the text on the level of "like or dislike." I asked you about how you define the text, if you exclude the possibility of its refining and production of issues to him.