Evaluation and Attribution

[Fed]

Сообщение от Dmitry73

I would like to hear the views of other experts on the origins and authorship of the work.

On the origin of emails you, my grandmother bought in Leningrad, and authorship inscribed in the corner.

But this picture brings extra spice because of clashes of experts:
The first deputy director of the Tretyakov Gallery:
 "Let's bring expert painting of a Dane, signed by the same Lagorio. The both of 1863. The artist used the same colors in Europe. And no chemist here will not prove anything. Conduct an examination, he would say only that the language used in the dyes or their components have been adopted in the mid-nineteenth century. We are talking mainly about the forgeries of paintings of the nineteenth century. "
According to experts, Vladimir Petrov, the album "The Lion Lagorio", released by respected publishing house "White City", about thirty (!) Paintings belong not Lagorio, and Danish, German and French painters! And on this album with students, art historians, totally unsuspecting trick. If only the creators of "Catalogue of counterfeit works of art" did not occur to rummage in the archives of the European auctions and did not find complete analogues of these "Lagorio, overweening hype would have surfaced."

And suddenly you have a genuine Lagorio and it will become a reference for the examination. In the genre of black humor, take the examination at the Tretyakov Gallery, and then Vladimir Petrov.

P.S. Forgot to clarify what the disassembly-Tretyakovka navydavala "erroneous" conclusions, and "Catalog ..." pointed it out, and one of its drafters, Petrov, an expert of the Tretyakov Gallery and honestly of the errors and for themselves, became independent from the former and the Tretyakov expert.