Вернуться   Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство > English forum > Investing in Art
 English | Русский Forum ARTinvestment.RU RSS Регистрация Дневники Справка Сообщество Сообщения за день Поиск

Investing in Art Share your opinion about the profitability of investments.

 
 
Опции темы Опции просмотра
Старый 20.09.2010, 01:54 Язык оригинала: Русский       #11
Бывалый
 
Регистрация: 22.04.2010
Адрес: St Petersburg
Сообщений: 399
Спасибо: 258
Поблагодарили 707 раз(а) в 242 сообщениях
Репутация: 1403
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Fed Посмотреть сообщение
If the cause was the buyer, they would still eat bacon with cabbage soup, and not the land of croissants. If you have a fundamentally new group of products - watch a couple of months as the new gate, and then start buying.
  So it is in services, a new auction.
Excuse me, are you talking about? I really do not understand what you mean.

Цитата:
A particularly successful would grow at auctions: compare the same Tselkov-successful at the auction went to 6 times more expensive failure.
With adequate pricing would be adequate and uhodimost. And as artists and galleries try to find fools, and even if they have enough, but not when it comes to money.
Prices adequate, and uhodimost adequate. Tselkov is gone, as you testify? And his successful works are growing and now. Do not grow what he has done in recent years. In addition, like to clarify: we discuss Russia or Ukraine? Personally, I'm talking about Russia. Prices here are the same as in the West. Yes, and salaries of most of the group that is potentially going to buy the painting, about the same as in the West (well, you subtract from thence salaries taxes paid, and receive our wages from which taxes are still often not paid).

The problem is that our potential buyer - he either lost his money in a crisis, or has not yet enjoyed the luxury. Not napokupalsya he cars, yachts, motorcycles, lies in nightclubs. In the West, they have naotzhigalis, but we have - yet. Remember how modestly dressed thence wealthy people and how rasfufyrivayutsya us. That's when sicken, then start looking around, thinking about the soul.

We bought the painting just the oligarchs who have a well, everything. They just know what to do money. But the artist makes (creates) it is the middle class, which we almost there.

Remember what was happening before the crisis. What an incredible growth. And why? Yes because there were free money. Why then all the way collapsed? Because there was money. Of course, prices are reduced to, and then rose to over smoothly, but it would be a natural process.

People who bought at the flea market with hand painting or reproduction, are not included in. Again, lack of education also influences. So it was always and everywhere. Then these big money bought, education, and even catch on, but it also requires time.

So I say: we now have, I think, a normal buyer is not. He will appear, but a little later.



Алек Сандер вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 6 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Алек Сандер за это полезное сообщение:
Aquarius (04.03.2013), artcol (20.09.2010), dedulya37 (20.09.2010), DSF (20.09.2010), K-Maler (15.12.2013), Евгений (20.09.2010)
 

Метки
contemporary art


Ваши права в разделе
Вы не можете создавать новые темы
Вы не можете отвечать в темах
Вы не можете прикреплять вложения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения

BB коды Вкл.
Смайлы Вкл.
[IMG] код Вкл.
HTML код Выкл.

Быстрый переход

Похожие темы
Тема Автор Разделы Ответов Последние сообщения
Why different prices for examination? Glasha Appraisal 32 03.03.2009 18:35
Contemporary art in museums Meister Costs, valuation, attribution 72 07.08.2008 20:07
Contemporary Art. Criticism of criticism))) LCR Artists, artworks, art history 27 18.07.2008 18:17




Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 13:03.
Telegram - Обратная связь - Обработка персональных данных - Архив - Вверх


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot