Цитата:
Сообщение от Vladimir
The memory comes to that, at Sotheby's until recently Krasnopevtsev the year of death was listed in 1955. A majority of sold works were created after the "death". Generally, whether or not to dramatize such things? I, for example, the case of the astronaut from the author's vision of the lad Bartholomew only amused. Like any ridiculous clause.
Build interpolation from a reservation in the direction of the competence of the editors - an obvious stretch.
|
I think the reservation clause discord: given that the animal died, it seems, in 1986, the dating of more than 1,988 suspicious of his work evokes a smile - it's not just a forgery, and falsification of otherworldly
Your example with Krasnopevtsev too funny, and of course, you are absolutely right, it's simple gaffe.
But when, for example, all the now familiar Arri Belle from the newspaper "Le Monde" (it will be necessary on occasion to ask him anything as a gift for PR, which I helped him in these cyber-walls) wrote an article about nonconformists that the bulldozer exhibition was held in 1951, a smile goes a person, as he discovers thus very approximate ownership of their subject, and in passing and total ignorance of the history of the USSR - scary to think what the machine would send a great linguist of all nations and peoples to to bring artists to their senses, and what would these machines their watered.