Ideal forum: utopia or ...

[Art-lover]

Сообщение от Admin

A serious study.

Let's just say: Christmas tale with a hint of the theme for collaborative research.

Сообщение от Tana

and in my opinion, the author may himself remove his "masterpieces" from the "squabbling" At least I have his removed without problems.: Shy:

All brilliant - easy! If that wrote Tana, and in fact is true, then the troubled section of stay alone masochists: rolleyes:

Сообщение от Zenia

I think it is not necessary to divide reality into the virtual and real. Forum is part of real life, though we communicate here virtually. But men are alive ....
What is the "squabbling" only reflects the fact that this part of reality!

Сообщение от Zenia

.... Well, what to do with innate anarchism?

Zenia, for the first time I see anarchists who advocate for the life of hyper-realism. : D: confused:
And what if the revolt against the vulgar reality and Porobovati right before it corrected through the adoption of a more worthy virtuality? How's astrologers say - per aspera ad astra?

Сообщение от Admin

section "Controversy" will not be perceived as unworthy, which fall into shame. Thus, lost all of its educational value.

I understand your point. But there is a subtle and damn important.

Читать дальше... 

When promotion forum because you are interested in not only quantitative, but also - and above all - quality of the participants?
But serious people related to art, often peculiar to the domestic aristocracy and aesthetically look at things.
Forum is not an exception to this series of things.
And if after the first acquaintance with him will be found a false note - the second singles may no longer be.
At best, people can register to view the information in the database, but to participate in the forum, the aura that does not seem perfect, he would abstain.

And the criteria for making a final decision is likely to be "landmark trifles" expressing a close view of the degree of elitism forum or the will of managers to such.
Noble people at all times prefer to be beheaded than subjected to public flogging - punishment for the plebs. If there is a network share to "squabble" - then it's potentially a place for the plebs.
You decide which contingents of priority.

The presence of "an unpleasant and unattractive side of forum life" smart people, and so figure it out. Is it worth it to accentuate the sake of a hypothetical educational influence on the slow-witted?
Moreover, the rules of conduct and consequences of their violations of the newcomers are informed at registration.

I assure you that with a strong interest of the participants of the positive atmosphere of the forum and mechanisms of self-regulation will effectively deal with small excesses than a demonstration of administrative paternalism is justified only when clear predominance of random people on the forum.

I have exhausted their arguments and if they will show you lightweight, then at that and stopped.