Glamor in the art

[Самвел]

Originally Posted by Tjutchev

Something tells me that you're late

For some reason I think that there is a place for dark, there was not enough.

[Ninni]

Veronic, you most like an artist Terry Rodgers?
If yes, please comment on the fact that I found common ground.

[Тютчев]

Originally Posted by Samvel

For some reason I think that there is a place for dark, there was not enough.

     Well, I do not know, I do not know.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 36 seconds[/color]

Originally Posted by Veronic

By the way, I want to show the work of another artist who I think works in glamor. It shows the well-fed western youth. I think that it is modern.

So Terry Rogers (children and the faint-hearted from a computer screen is better to divert)

http://www.terryrodgers.com/

     Pure Coke!

[NATA NOVA]

Originally Posted by Tjutchev

Pure Coke!

And what is "coke"? This gugolnoe? (In Google there?)

[Veronic]

Originally Posted by Ninni

Veronic, you most like an artist Terry Rodgers?
If yes, please comment on the fact that I found the point of contact.

Terry Rodgers (Terry Rodgers) - a skilled portraitist. The heroes of his pictures - the languid and bourgeois, glamorous apathetic Party People, regulars cocktail parties, and draughty in their eyes disappointment combines them with the beautiful but doomed "characters of F. Scott Fitzgerald. Half-naked women with full lips and perfectly folded male mannequins, they seem to betray an instant orgy, unless, of course, notice to each other in their total indifference.



"Terry Rogers - a realist, known for its picturesque actual studios. It attracts private night life of the American" golden "youth. An impressive canvases Rogers is widely exhibited in the United States and Europe, and provoked strong public reaction. The artist paints in oils, based on photographs and not disdaining to use advances in computers. First, he photographed their models separately, after collecting several figures into one composition on the computer and then uses the constructed picture for his canvases. With mastery of brush, his canvases become a complex optical instrument.
Painter-class American society, Terry Rogers boldly reveals the essence of this circle. His realism - it is very truthful picture of life in suburban villas and urban mansions. Luxury receptions, parties at the pool, vacation in the islands, the world of adults, focused on success, and their children, vaguely aware of their surrounding emptiness.

Half-naked characters in the paintings of Rogers is so naturalistic that his paintings often referred to as the art-porn, although a significant difference between the artist's works from the modern pornographic materials is the lack of direct references to graphic sexual intercourse. In addition, today's ambiguous situations and the nakedness of the human body from the porn industry infiltrated the media and advertising. Like Jeff Koons, Marc Quinn, Chapman brothers, Terry Rogers uses key symbols and elements of visual rhetoric of media to discredit and expose the radical myth of capitalist prosperity that tezhe media to actively support and nourish. His paintings are similar to the curved mirror, able to reveal the hidden aspects of reality.

There is something in the building originally pornographic human relations, carried out according to the laws of market economy and modern mores, which provide for the inclusion of sexuality in the public, so that instead of helpless resistance to this phenomenon, it can take. According to the French philosopher Michel Foucault, the survival of modern society and monitoring depend on the implementation of policies individualized pleasure and ostentatious behavior. Sexual desire does not exist outside of awareness and symbolization of specific societies and groups vying for power. For different metaphors and definitions of love and sexuality are not separate entities, and different strategies of social control and regulation of human actions and feelings.

Under the system, which itself incites people to to get pleasure from exposing private, paintings by Terry Rodgers embodies the idea of nudity is less than the idea of visibility (not nakedness but visibility). In addition, the wealth and luxury are not so much attributes of a successful lifestyle, how many obstacles on the path to happiness. Driven by a set of rewards and immediate pleasures, individuals willing to engage in a system which, at first glance, consistent with their wishes, although in fact they are included in the structure nadziraniya and punishment. They are processed and schooled system so that they become both the object and instrument of power. This inevitably generates a strong sense of alienation and fear.

In the world of well-being of human survival depends on his obedient consumption in the world of material luxury is no room luxury of deep human relations. Because even the intimacy lost its appeal, because everyone turned inward and enjoys its own beauty and success, therefore, society has created a special type of frigidity caused by new nartsisizmom.
Paintings by Terry Rogers radiate existential emptiness and leave from the glamor of one of his shell, no more solid than the egg shells. Ultimately, the artist invites people to re-learn to see each other. "

Source http://www.artpages.org.ua/

[Тютчев]

Originally Posted by NATA NOVA

What is "coke"? This gugolnoe? (In Google there?)

   No, it pernazalno.

[Veronic]

Originally Posted by NATA NOVA

What is "coke"? This gugolnoe? (In Google there?)

Nata, civilization you have not yet spoiled, this is good. Cox came from the word cocaine. Coke is slang.

[Jasmin]

Originally Posted by Tjutchev

this pernazalno

more and swallow

[Ninni]

Dear Veronique, that "sexuality" or rather vulgar women in his paintings - is identical with the full vulgarity of his "art". -I would call his "risovalchestvo" - Sex and the City, even umudrivshisby this insult eponymous film.

Pile of tanned bodies, compositional absurdity, stupidity and complete lack of portraits of ideas .....

Originally Posted by Veronic

Painter-class American society

- He generally knows what is painting? It is doubtful that his subconscious has ever come into contact with this concept ....

Originally Posted by Veronic

Terry Rogers boldly reveals the essence of this circle

- He is not revealing - he advocates, indulges, promotes and operates - business and nothing personal. "

Originally Posted by Veronic

In the system, which itself incites people to to get pleasure from exposing private

Art humbly incitement of the masses?

No, art should reach the masses and the masses should be drawn to the arts.

I have not found a link on the article but I asked your opinion and obviously you gave it to me strange, not quite adequate words.

[Тютчев]

And where there Ksenia Sobchak?! In, lights!