Go to fight some old - Page 2 - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Евгений · 21-05-2009, 14:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by izofond

We are afraid that it? ..

I just wrote: gebeshny writing style, something to fear?

izofond · 21-05-2009, 15:01

Well illustrations with it, with style. And indeed, why do not want?

Евгений · 21-05-2009, 15:08

izofond, In fact, such letters only undermine the credibility of the Soviet zhivopisi.Ya happy to collect and disseminate Soviet art during 1930 1960gg.S letter, written in a tone and content, strongly disagreed.

Vladimir · 21-05-2009, 15:23

How about this? Most of the signatories to a collective letter - is honored people in old age. Wait for their enthusiasm in relation to contemporary art, it would be strange. To understand the logic would be even the instigators of such collective letters? Previously, it was hard for the ideology and multi-pass policy. And now what for?

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eugene

such letters only undermine the credibility of Soviet painting

Do not overestimate the consequences of "the old battlefield. After rollback Vakhtang Kikabidze after the South Ossetian conflict has changed? We have less love "Mimino"?

Кирилл Сызранский · 21-05-2009, 15:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vladimir

We have become less love "Mimino"?

I became more loving Vakhtang Kikabidze.

Vladimir · 21-05-2009, 15:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

I became more loving Vakhtang Kikabidze.

Intrigued. Why?

Евгений · 21-05-2009, 15:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vladimir

And now for something?

Here it is incomprehensible known provakator A. Prokhanov (with-sheet "Tomorrow").

izofond · 21-05-2009, 15:52

Well, okay. And do you agree that each era should have its own museum?
Old Tretyakov Gallery, New - the Soviet period (the building under it and built), well, for "relevance" who wants to can build its own, as well as for modern Russian realism of the 21 st century. It's so logical and so true? In a letter that's about it, and only that.

Кирилл Сызранский · 21-05-2009, 15:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vladimir

intrigued. Why?

For his courageous and clear position.
For waiver of the Order of Friendship of Peoples ".
For the song "disappointed ..."

Кирилл Сызранский · 21-05-2009, 16:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

for refusing orders "Friendship of peoples".

And here is the decree on his nagrozhdenii.
Note the date.

21-05-2009, 15:01	Original language: Russian #12
izofond Новичок Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 26 Thanks: 0 Thanked 40 Times in 11 Posts Reputation: 44	Well illustrations with it, with style. And indeed, why do not want?

21-05-2009, 15:08	Original language: Russian #13
Евгений Гуру Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 14,663 Thanks: 18,865 Thanked 16,456 Times in 4,506 Posts Blog Entries: 254 Reputation: 32443	izofond, In fact, such letters only undermine the credibility of the Soviet zhivopisi.Ya happy to collect and disseminate Soviet art during 1930 1960gg.S letter, written in a tone and content, strongly disagreed.

21-05-2009, 15:52	Original language: Russian #18
izofond Новичок Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 26 Thanks: 0 Thanked 40 Times in 11 Posts Reputation: 44	Well, okay. And do you agree that each era should have its own museum? Old Tretyakov Gallery, New - the Soviet period (the building under it and built), well, for "relevance" who wants to can build its own, as well as for modern Russian realism of the 21 st century. It's so logical and so true? In a letter that's about it, and only that.