Vekselberg has accused Christie's in counterfeit trade

[тандем]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

No Vekselberg, nor Aurora Fund did not have to involve experts for a simple reason:

- Christie's - Auction with a solid reputation.
- The picture had a history of selling at the same Christie's.
- Was put on view in Moscow.
- And most importantly, 5-year money-back guarantee, if you have 2 negative examinations.

Here's your answer from the posts 56 of the same themes from the Vladimir
Administrator "to talk about it with a colleague who worked in the marketing of transnational companies. In two years younger, but most intelligent people. It agreed that it is a normal tactic of defense - not to recognize the charges to fight. It turns out there are lots of people-amateurs who believe that the brand auctions are not sold falshaki. and continue to think so. They are by no means impossible to disappoint. " Yes, bad probably be a cheerleader," teapot "," Lohoma "... ...
Further

Сообщение от OlegTsi

And even if the pre-auction show would be an expert, how could he be the technical and laboratory study of the paintings, on the basis of which were made questionable conclusions?

Your answers in his article Sokolova "..... immediately after purchase "Odalisque" it looked one of the largest collectors of Russian art and the naked eye, determined that the picture is forged. "It seems to go on the Avenue, which, unlike "principled" Petrova no need for this microscope.
I think it is clear who is an amateur ....... How can a bear and not even in the picture here is - the case to the reputation of himself. And this is not a joke.

[artcol]

[Amateur]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

In recent years, become available to the public the facts of "transforming" the landscape of the Scandinavian and non-Metzke artists in Russian works. For example, Louis Gurlitt became Alexey Bogolyubov, Jan Salakur - Alexander Kiselev, Moras - Lev Lagorio, Kruge - Constantine Kryzhitsky, William Porst - Fyodor Vasilyev.

Сообщение от Tjutchev

$ 1.28 million canvas was dated 1863, a time when Shishkin trained in Europe and was influenced by the so-called School of Dusseldorf in the landscape. But the picture was removed from the auction beforehand. In the auction house called the Russian expert, reported that the work - a fake. "Landscape with a stream" was retouched the work of Dutch artist Marinus Adrian Kukkuka, the price is not more than $ 65 thousand Someone deleted from the picture of a lamb and human figures, adding the signature Shishkin.

Give subversive thought. If it is direct, it must be true in reverse. If we are deleting figures and the lamb managed to turn a Kukkuka Shishkin (in terms of painting), so much so that almost no one figured out, it probably could be done and vice versa. Get's squares (or Vassiliev, or Lagorio, etc.) to remove the signature pririsovat lamb or a small house in a European style - and then (again - in terms of art) would have made Kukkuk (or Porst, and Moras, etc. .)? It seems to be hard to argue. But then it logically follows that the level of painting secondary European artists of the same as in first names Russian painting, if that is so easy to transform one into the other? And millions do not pay for the painting, not because of talent, but only for autographs? By the way, still a controversial question: who is better - Gurlitt or Bogolyubov.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Amateur

But then it logically follows that the level of minor European artists painting the same as in the first names of Russian painting, if that is so easy to transform one into the other?

This has already been 2 years on the forum said.

Added after 19 minutes
But you, Amateur, and may, for example, argue:
 

Сообщение от Tjutchev

So this whole section holds fakes. Or do you want, that would turn! So it's absurd. Now if they took our artists and passed off as foreign then there really should think. Do not get less quality, is awarded for a better quality. In this, there is some logic agree? Why do "good" artists to sell as "bad Russian" if they are good? The market has its own laws. He was not fooled. Russian academic art has always been prized in Europe. This confirms all the same market.

[sergejnowo]

[Игорь Гурьев]

In Repin, Venenianovym (and his school), Soroca, Savrasov and several others, it will not work.

A Shishkin - a good artist, especially knew how to assemble and paint.
What were sought to replace him in the West - is an early Shishkin, who wrote all types.

Bogoliubov - all artists with the exaggerated importance of the West have been hundreds.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

No, would not have got

Of course!
Can you believe that the greatest Shishkin can take over some Kukkuka-even if they after "completion" will kukkukovskaya signature and through the woods will be viewable Church.

Added after 2 minutes
Igor Guriev, we talk about neutral subjects, landscapes, for example.
Why give Venetsianov (and his school), forty and even more so-Repin?

[Тютчев]

[Игорь Гурьев]

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

Igor Guriev, we talk about neutral subjects, landscapes, for example.
Why give Venetsianov (and his school), forty and even more so-Repin?

That fact of the matter is that Soroka and Savrasov not write "neutral subjects.

And in scenes such as Shishkin Rye and Oak Grove did as anybody not to do.