"Artist's shit" from the Tar Catherine

[Nedogonov]

Almost straight from the tin intellectual product of Katherina Tar, an art critic, curator, chief-editor section of art portal OpenSpace.ru.

• The traditional left in the past, those who practiced today, involved a kind of fishing. There is still Palekh boxes and Khokhloma - so that's "modern traditional art" as you put it in the same status.

• "Artist's shit" is a work of art, not the artist's shit, because it invested considerable intellectual force of the author and the hundreds of art historians and philosophers who have written about this and write.

• Art is no longer connected with the idea of beauty.

• The criterion of success of the artist - this is (apart from talent, which no one has repealed) of his consciousness. He must understand that doing and be able to explain it. In this he differs radically from the artist's past, which were supposed to "moo with delight, and silent

• Vasnetsov and Aivazovsky painted very badly, I tell you as a professional art historian and expert on the art of 19 century. And even then people said: compare modern daub with the work of Titian.

• Painting once was (before the Renaissance) and there and now as a separate art form.

• Art - this is not some kind of title (something that is better than no art). Art - this is such a professional field. This is something that is exhibited in museums and galleries.

They were all quotes. Completely read the press conference materials can be reached at: http://lenta.ru/conf/degot/

[Кирилл Сызранский]

I liked that: The issue of investments - an issue that will go down in history of art and what is not, judge for yourself about this, I do not give free advice on investments. (c)

[gans]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I liked: The issue of investments - an issue that will go down in history of art and what is not, judge for yourself about this, I do not give free advice on investments. (c)

And that, right.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

dedulya37, not my quote ... : D

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Nedogonov

• Vasnetsov and Aivazovsky painted very badly, I tell you as a professional art historian and expert on the art of 19 century. And even then people said: compare modern daub with the work of Titian.

Never thought she was smart. But so ...! No, she was unwell! Vasnetsov could not draw! Well one must! Yes, it just d.. Well! I'm shocked! About such people, eye to e. .. w: D

[color="# 666686"]Posted 10 minutes[/color]
No, you just think, "painted very badly." To give!!!: D

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Yes it is simply the village. Well! I'm shocked!

Colleagues, I understand that the material you are shocked, but it is not necessary to cross the correct emotion. The man with the position. Brave enough, perfectly predicting the reaction to its findings and, nevertheless, do not abandon them. I, in addition to several other conclusions, like in this publication very definite answers, specifics. Many people in similar circumstances would have appeared temptation pouvilivat to show diplomacy, all with one hand ... on the other hand ... " A Tar answered very specifically, radical, burning bridges for the discrepancies.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Vladimir

A Tar answered very specifically, radical, burning bridges for the discrepancies.

That's got very specific and radical reactions. What else? Think it is necessary ...

[color="# 666686"]Added after 4 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Vladimir

PS: she speaks in public, stunningly captures the essence of the "murky" issues and quickly orintiruetsya. But read her theoretical work, the same book on the art of XX century IMHO is very difficult. But it saves the selection of illustrations

     Hitler also spoke well and agreed! : D

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от Vladimir

I, in addition to several other conclusions, like in this publication very definite answers, specifics. Many people in similar circumstances would have appeared temptation pouvilivat to show diplomacy, all with one hand ... on the other hand ... " A Tar answered very specifically, radical, burning bridges for the discrepancies.

It is incidentally expressed so clearly, just on the forum discussing the relevance iskusstvo.Vot that it has made, it is their program. She's one of those M. Gelman included "in the number 50" (to be typed or 666?).

[uriart]

Probably work of any person who can draw takes place to be.
I think that this situation should work natural selection.
And when such as this tar brainwashed society, it is not correct.
It's no secret that many do not receive recognition during his lifetime. But it did not leave them unnoticed. Moreover, they were recognized genius!
And time is a great healer and will put everything in its place.
And as such tar will not break nails, I may say so, this painting will find its place in the dustbin of history!
And she does not suffer kaprofiliey case?

[gans]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Yes it is simply the village. Well!

This is certainly not the case.