H.DIRIT

[wertu777]

Dear friends, the big request still attributing the picture and if possible estimate of the amount ekvivalente.Etu picture discussed, rather than its tov.Balagura and so departed from the topic a bit.

Dimensions 40H55

Thank you in advance specialists and experts

with HC

Добавлено через 3 минуты
more photo pictures

[wertu777]

more photo pictures

[wertu777]

more photo pictures

proposals can be in the LS

[Балагур]

Сообщение от wertu777

Dear friends, the big request attribute still picture and possible estimate of the amount ekvivalente.Etu picture discussed, rather than its tov.Balagura and so departed from the topic a bit .
dimensions 40H55
Thank you in advance specialists and experts
with HC

Maybe I did not put it very clear , the reason for my refusal to buy the picture? I will say clearly: this picture is - a bad copy of the one I was talking about . Daubed terrible! I do not need other people's bullshit .
Even the ashtray and cigarette butts could not draw , at least smoothly and naturally. And I can see the matches on the original two parties , one of them shaded . Shirt on the cards, the edge of cards in the deck, all the vague outline jagged lines marked, and much more .
I said everything. Else, it 's your problem.

[wertu777]

so you have a photo of the picture did not survive? And it's words!

Added after 8 minutes
CONSIDER YOURSELF TO WHOM DOES THE MEANING OF YOUR pretty vague description of "daub" copy (and WAY SIGN 1916 (not as in your description)!? ARE ALLOWED? RUBENS? Matisse? ANY SENSE TO - explained to all
UDOBAVARIMO (interest in the topic has many)!

With HC

[Балагур]

Сообщение от wertu777

so you have pictures of the picture did not survive ? And it's words!

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 8 minutes[/color]
CONSIDER YOURSELF TO WHOM DOES THE MEANING OF YOUR pretty vague description of " daub " copy (and WAY SIGN 1916 (not as in your description )! ? ARE ALLOWED ? RUBENS ? Matisse? ANY SENSE TO - explained to all UDOBAVARIMO ( interest in the topic has many )!
With HC

"interest in the topic has many" - is not the case that I should satisfy the interests of many .
The picture was sold at the time, and your - bad copy of it. It even lacks some of the details on the table. Do not want to talk about it.

[wertu777]

You have no evidence for the argument (no photo, one word) and probably already brings memory - even objects not enough ... So the "back" to include at least ugly, too, would say he changed his mind, no money, etc.

with HC

[Балагур]

Сообщение от wertu777

You do not have to argue the facts ( no pictures , just words ) and probably already brings memory - even objects not enough ... So the "back " to include at least ugly, too , would say he changed his mind , money no , etc.
with HC

I did not promise anything to anyone ! read here! And you copy on the hammer, guarantee authenticity !
Just me -you do not vtyuhali her , despite all the pressure, and rudeness - "at least ugly" Stop fooling people head ! On what grounds warrant the authenticity ? It is better to keep quiet .

[Konstantin]

Balagur, well, what can be a guarantee of authenticity for price of 1500 rubles. ($ 50 )? Who would think to ask for the examination of such value ? Well, a picture and a picture of a little-known artist.
 You have voiced their opinion - is enough.
Bicker more stupid.
wertu777, is to appeal to you too .

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Balagur

Stop fooling people head!

In my view, it is you fool people's heads: [QUOTE="Balagur; 2346511"] In the end, I want except for the information about the artist, to contemplate the picture, similar to the one that I had.[/
QUOTE]