N.E.Sverchkov, hunting dogs

[VITBER]

Good day!

Interested in your opinion.

Best regards!

Novel

[serj]

More on Europe seems

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от serj; 2413161"

More on Europe seems

It is, pardon me, no matter what it does not. As previously given picture, these two masterpieces in the alleged author does not have any relation.
And here is where I am really ready to take responsibility for their words at any level and in front of any audience.
Definitely a false signature, the total absence of color and common sense. Well, about the errors in anatomy I do not want to say - it's just a shame!
A Zhukovsky Crickets, plus all his other numerous advantages - was one of the best Russian animal painters. Between us, girls saying. And the dogs, said no worse than horses. He wrote and drew, and even sculpted. And genre scenes with dogs, and dog portraits, of which only from 1852 to 1879 wrote at least 15! And Karamzin, and Olsufyeva, and Demidov (not to mention a pet imeratorskoy member names). And it is - only the portraits, which are known for the annual "report IAH," and went in there a few. And then - what Chupacabra is not sewn - not pristebay. Two full u.bischa, forgive me, Lord!
 The perturbation will not even lead standards (and their - I have. Dozens something - just typed. And lifetime of publications - as well).
I am very curious: what-such outstanding work presents works N.E.Sverchkova N.G.Shildera and in the collection of the Museum of Riga? And why not, these masterpieces are exhibited in the halls and not included in the catalog of the museum? Riddle, shit!
How are you, VITBER, upset me!

[VITBER]

SW. Amateur! Do not worry , it 's not worth it .
We have a profile of activities is quite broad and specialist in Russian visual art is not ( too rarely we appear ratings, Russian artists) , so the proposed work has been put up for discussion.

[Art-ort]

One of two or Nina Lapidus not be ekspertom.Ili Nina Lapidus not vkurse existence of these multiple pictures.

I tend to think that all examinations fake.

[VITBER]

Сообщение от Art-ort

tend to think that all the expertise of a fake.

I repeat ...

"Just on the phone with HC. Lapidus Nina and she podvterdila authenticity of all these conclusions."

[Eriksson]

Usually, the museums are treated with great piitetom the official name of their organizations.
In this case, the museum is called National Art Museum.
This is true, by the way ...

[Светлячок]

Сообщение от VITBER; 2413991"

" Just on the phone with HC. Lapidus Nina and she podvterdila authenticity of all these conclusions ."

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2414771"

but I think that you have become a target of fraud or those you are trying to do, and these " art critical examination" - episodes of this scam .

And as for me , it's more like a deliberate deskreditatsiyu (judging by the work and conclusions - certainly sound ) Nina Lapidus.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Firefly , 2415091"

And as for me , it's more like a deliberate deskreditatsiyu (judging by the work and conclusions - certainly sound ) Nina Lapidus.

And why would anyone give a " intentional deskreditatsiyu " Riga art on the Russian forum?
For example, I first learned about this art critic here , but now the network looked and thought some of her books.

[VITBER]

I suspect malice does not make sense . The organizer and co-owner of the auction house in Riga. My reputation is very dear to me and I do not like the game play. If I was to fuck someone , work would be offered for sale without discussion ( viewed at the idiot ). I come to the forum , not to make a fatal mistake by signing the sentence my case, to find an answer to the question, to replenish teoritecheskih knowledge in the various sections of antiques and collectibles , and sometimes just a pleasant time with respectable people.
In other forums, I have a positive reputation , no negativity there . Here (in artinvestment) plus I was a beginner with the " range ", resulting in the attitude of some participants has reason to me that I would like to dispel.