N.E.Sverchkov, hunting dogs
 

Good day!

Interested in your opinion.

Best regards!

Novel

More on Europe seems

It is, pardon me, no matter what it does not. As previously given picture, these two masterpieces in the alleged author does not have any relation.
And here is where I am really ready to take responsibility for their words at any level and in front of any audience.
Definitely a false signature, the total absence of color and common sense. Well, about the errors in anatomy I do not want to say - it's just a shame!
A Zhukovsky Crickets, plus all his other numerous advantages - was one of the best Russian animal painters. Between us, girls saying. And the dogs, said no worse than horses. He wrote and drew, and even sculpted. And genre scenes with dogs, and dog portraits, of which only from 1852 to 1879 wrote at least 15! And Karamzin, and Olsufyeva, and Demidov (not to mention a pet imeratorskoy member names). And it is - only the portraits, which are known for the annual "report IAH," and went in there a few. And then - what Chupacabra is not sewn - not pristebay. Two full u.bischa, forgive me, Lord!
 The perturbation will not even lead standards (and their - I have. Dozens something - just typed. And lifetime of publications - as well).
I am very curious: what-such outstanding work presents works N.E.Sverchkova N.G.Shildera and in the collection of the Museum of Riga? And why not, these masterpieces are exhibited in the halls and not included in the catalog of the museum? Riddle, shit!
How are you, VITBER, upset me!

SW. Amateur! Do not worry , it 's not worth it .
We have a profile of activities is quite broad and specialist in Russian visual art is not ( too rarely we appear ratings, Russian artists) , so the proposed work has been put up for discussion.

One of two or Nina Lapidus not be ekspertom.Ili Nina Lapidus not vkurse existence of these multiple pictures.

I tend to think that all examinations fake.

I repeat ...

"Just on the phone with HC. Lapidus Nina and she podvterdila authenticity of all these conclusions."

Usually, the museums are treated with great piitetom the official name of their organizations.
In this case, the museum is called National Art Museum.
This is true, by the way ...

VITBER, I understand that you " profile of the rather wide " and you " a specialist in Russian visual art is not ", but I think you become the object of some sort of fraud or those you are trying to do, and these " art critical examination" - episodes of this scam .
But the fact that you came to this forum , it is encouraging , I suppose that you are the object of the wiring will not turn her into a victim.

What sense do fake inspection when living ( let it B. Health) Nina Lapidus ? This is also possible to check for a half- minute. ...

Meaning- "Perhaps blow over ." To Stockholm certainly crazy, but we still working :)>
Just do not accept the idea that the expert could testify knowingly " such things." (Though not seen such mistakes .)