"For the sacred symbols pay big money '

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky; 2676411"

as likes to Mikhail Kamensky

If I remembered the Honourable Kamensky, you have to open and his interview recall - Chapter «Sotheby's Russia," Mikhail Kamensky - a record price of Russian art .

Here's a snippet, but read, I think we should all interviews:

by authors such as Natalia Goncharova and Mikhail Larionov, included in the global art context, on any trading correct display - Russian art and modernism? You said that the Russian sold at auction Sotheby's «Cubist Woman" (1920) Goncharova was greatly underestimated. Whether strongly affects the value of the product of his environment?

Russian buyer who is familiar with the works of major Russian avant-garde artists, better understands, for example, in the work of Natalia Goncharova than a collector of avant-garde from France, Canada and England. Because he has a full understanding of the creative development of the artist. But when a high-class work by Natalia Goncharova exhibited in the context of the Russian auction collection, mixed stylistically and chronologically, it is in the eye of the beholder, of course, loses. This is understandable, Russian bid are formed not on museum or thematically, but exclusively by the national. Another thing is themed auction of Impressionist and Modern art. When the important work of Goncharova and Larionov is in the same row with the visual works of outstanding modernist and avant-garde European artists deservedly seen as comparable in price, quality and the fate of the other expensive brands of art of the twentieth century. And if Goncharova will be puzzled with a suspicious look extremely traditional buyer Shishkin, then rely on its responsiveness to occur.

From my point of view, "Cubist Woman" Goncharova, sold at auction last Russian for about a million dollars, was indeed significantly underestimated. Do this thing, other than the obvious artistic qualities, have a history. Are there many certainties Goncharova's works on the market? Virtually no! But this work, torn from the European context, is not able to appreciate the world of avant-garde collectors. Russian collectors as a tribute to fashion, prefer early Goncharov, for five to seven years earlier.

Where is advantageous to expose the "intermediate" writers like Boris Grigoriev and Petr Konchalovsky?

Of course, the Russian bid their fans more. Boris Grigoriev carries a special stylistic oddity, adored Russian flavor. Pyotr Konchalovsky, linking the Russian view and Cezannism, again much more interesting it is Russian. He seems secondary to those who have the opportunity to buy Cezanne himself, but it does not feel the Russian language feature "sezannistov." To such "intermediate" reservoir is a significant part of the Artists of the Russian emigration. They themselves have absorbed two traditions, but the market for rare exceptions are perceived as Russian artists.

Well, you can imagine that the same people will buy Aivazovsky and Goncharov?

Either one or the other. An exception may be the investment fund, to which all the same. His goal - to buy something from his point of view, undervalued, and then resell. Collectors usually collect something stylistically close, visually incongruous.

[Pavel]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

If I remembered the Honourable Kamensky , you have to open and his interviews recall - Chapter «Sotheby's Russia ," Mikhail Kamensky - a record price of Russian art .

Here's a snippet , but read , I think we should all interviews :

I do not know what a " global art context ." Goncharova and Larionov, known Tretyakov presented their paintings , so the sale can only be the work of foreign collections or fake. Because they are well known in the art world , of course the price for them is growing , and another factor is the rich Russian oligarchs who must be persuaded to buy expensive for anything from RRRusskogo . Nothing new . The new collection will be on the sale of the oligarchs.

[Fed]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

read, I think we should all interviews:

Surprisingly useful interview.
But after reading it is an idea, do not mess with Russian art.

[Pecheneg]

Originally Posted by Fed

Surprisingly useful interview.

Yes, useful .. but nothing new.
It has long been known that the Russian love Russian, German German, British English ...

[Pavel]

Originally Posted by Pecheneg

Yes, useful .. but nothing new.
It has long been known that the Russian love Russian, German German, British English ...

That is why Russian should be sold in Russia.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Pecheneg

It has long been known that the Russian love Russian, Germans, German, British English ...

But the Russian, who go to Germany, the German start buying, and who goes to the UK - nagliyskoe, in an interview with GL this also there.
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[Pecheneg]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

Russian who go to Germany, the German start buying, and who move to Britain - English,

Yes, you're right ... But it's not collectors and investors.