Law on privatization of monuments

[Meister]

in Moscow adopted a law on the privatization of cultural heritage
Law "On privatization of state property of the city of Moscow" was adopted on Wednesday at a meeting of the Moscow City Duma. About it reports RIA Novosti.

The law establishes the procedure for the privatization of cultural heritage objects owned by the city, and establishes the obligation for the owners to restore and preserve the privatized sites. This duty will be indicated in the security obligations of the owner as "burdens of ownership.

Читать дальше... 

The law establishes a maximum limit of the area of privatized space of 100 square meters. The new owners of cultural heritage is given a delay for payment of the privatization period of one year.

The right to sell subject to privatization of cultural heritage, according to the provisions of the law may be granted to selected organizations on a competitive basis. Prior to the adoption of the law, this right was secured only for the specialized organization for sale of property capital.

List of historic buildings that could be privatized, will be determined Heritage Committee. The list will be restricted at the legislative level, a list of objects that are not subject to privatization.

Sale of monuments of culture in part is prohibited.

Total of more than 6.5 thousand monuments of cultural heritage located in the capital, owned by the city there are about 1,8 thousand objects. 2,5 thousand monuments are in federal ownership. About 250 sites are privately owned.

Under the law, the status of cultural heritage objects are paintings, sculptures, decorative art, artefacts, resulting from historical events, which represent value in terms of history, archeology, architecture, art, science and technology. Moreover, this status also have "objects that bear witness to epochs and civilizations, the true sources of information about the origin and development of culture."

Recall that in early December, the Head of the Department of property of Moscow Vladimir Silkin paid attention that the adoption of the Federal Law № 159 "On privatization of state property in Moscow in the premises of the activities of small and medium businesses could trigger an increase in the number of raider grabs treasury of the city buildings.

__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ___________

again what a stupid udumali ... they saw that there is nothing? I do not believe in all these benefactors, who will restore the monuments and keep them ... Indeed, little land, and that such tidbits, and even in the center. Price per meter increases even more ...

[Selene]

I do not think that this form of ownership of memorials - a mistake, but on condition that the duties and responsibilities of owners will be clearly regulated and under the condition that these rules are not "dead". Furthermore, responsibility must be personal and for the owners and officials who have taken appropriate action. While this is not in the near future will not be. A sale of property at auction promotes corruption and dismiss officials from personal liability.

[Meister]

totally agree with you Selene, I sincerely believe even that in private hands, it can be preserved better than in public. BUT! because the law had, and clear rules who is responsible and what is his responsibility and there is unlikely to be. We will fight for this property, the outcome of which - the corruption, the transition of historical monuments in private hands, followed by a change in the past. Think about the branch of a mansion in Taganka ... The idea is good, but, as is usually incomplete, and therefore garbled ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Meister

transition of historical monuments in private hands, followed by a change in the past.

So they are destroying the monuments that are in public ownership. Red Square shopping arcade was demolished, which was headquarters of the rear IO. Where too next?

[Selene]

I do not know, as in other cities, but in Moscow, the destruction of monuments placed on stream for a long time. For example, the permanent collapse or a sharp deterioration of one or the other buildings in the historic center. And, significantly, that such collapses occur in the course of reconstruction of the same or adjacent building. While the property does not touch the builders, it is well worth ... or unexplained fires, when in Magpie Village lights up in several places ... Fires blamed on homeless people and the violation of various regulations and standards in the conduct of certain operations. Perhaps if you pass such buildings in private ownership, the owner will be more eager than the city to monitor them. Naturally, provided that after the destruction, the demolition of the building land-use rights will not be saved for the owner of the buildings, installations.

[Meister]

I understand that the essence of the law to transfer the ownership of monuments to the restrictions ... must find and read the law, although it still did not change. just to be aware of.

[Selene]

Сообщение от Meister

I understand that the essence of the law to transfer the ownership of monuments to the restrictions ... must find and read the law, although it still did not change. just to be aware of.

Article 9
http://www.duma.mos.ru/cgi-bin/prj_t...&unom=1857

[Meister]

about anything ... in parts is not permitted to sell, and resell it to anyone please ... to paraphrase: "You can all"

[Selene]

Сообщение от Meister

about anything ... in parts is not permitted to sell, and resell it to anyone please ... to paraphrase: "You can all"

Act - as a skeleton. As such, it does not work. Bylaws, rules of other laws you can make really working, and you can kill any, even the best idea.