![]() |
Law on privatization of monuments
in Moscow adopted a law on the privatization of cultural heritage
Law "On privatization of state property of the city of Moscow" was adopted on Wednesday at a meeting of the Moscow City Duma. About it reports RIA Novosti. The law establishes the procedure for the privatization of cultural heritage objects owned by the city, and establishes the obligation for the owners to restore and preserve the privatized sites. This duty will be indicated in the security obligations of the owner as "burdens of ownership.
Читать дальше...
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ___________ again what a stupid udumali ... they saw that there is nothing? I do not believe in all these benefactors, who will restore the monuments and keep them ... Indeed, little land, and that such tidbits, and even in the center. Price per meter increases even more ... |
I do not think that this form of ownership of memorials - a mistake, but on condition that the duties and responsibilities of owners will be clearly regulated and under the condition that these rules are not "dead". Furthermore, responsibility must be personal and for the owners and officials who have taken appropriate action. While this is not in the near future will not be. A sale of property at auction promotes corruption and dismiss officials from personal liability.
|
totally agree with you Selene, I sincerely believe even that in private hands, it can be preserved better than in public. BUT! because the law had, and clear rules who is responsible and what is his responsibility and there is unlikely to be. We will fight for this property, the outcome of which - the corruption, the transition of historical monuments in private hands, followed by a change in the past. Think about the branch of a mansion in Taganka ... The idea is good, but, as is usually incomplete, and therefore garbled ...
|
Цитата:
|
I do not know, as in other cities, but in Moscow, the destruction of monuments placed on stream for a long time. For example, the permanent collapse or a sharp deterioration of one or the other buildings in the historic center. And, significantly, that such collapses occur in the course of reconstruction of the same or adjacent building. While the property does not touch the builders, it is well worth ... or unexplained fires, when in Magpie Village lights up in several places ... Fires blamed on homeless people and the violation of various regulations and standards in the conduct of certain operations. Perhaps if you pass such buildings in private ownership, the owner will be more eager than the city to monitor them. Naturally, provided that after the destruction, the demolition of the building land-use rights will not be saved for the owner of the buildings, installations.
|
I understand that the essence of the law to transfer the ownership of monuments to the restrictions ... must find and read the law, although it still did not change. just to be aware of.
|
Цитата:
http://www.duma.mos.ru/cgi-bin/prj_t...&unom=1857 |
about anything ... in parts is not permitted to sell, and resell it to anyone please ... to paraphrase: "You can all"
|
Цитата:
|
| Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 08:47. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.