The exhibition "Gustav Klimt and Kunstschau 1908"

[fross]

Impression of the exhibition - no. Hall Klimt who is expected to shine and the holiday surprise greyness. And this is the effect of black and white reproductions of most of the works that hung in the place where in 1908, hung themselves work. But the originals, but they think there 5 or 6, so poorly highlighted, that look very sad. All souvenir products, and it is literally littered all Vienna, reproductions, video is much more attractive than the originals and spectacular works.
Taking photographs is strictly forbidden, but very much wanted to show the only bright spot on the entire exhibition - a room with posters. And so, though inferior, but the best part of this picture is so advertised the exhibition. The people are very little, and it seems only tourists, so for a hundred years the show has not become better, and how and when the people it does not go.: D

[Tamila]

Hmm .. strange, I thought I would be very bright event.
Thanks for the photos)

[Meister]

and original works are not what??

[fross]

The originals hang interspersed with black and white photographs in full size. Original Kiss hangs on a single wall. A Golden Adele - b & w photo. and two walls alternate: Photos and originals. But the originals seems to only five or six. I remember when she looked at Klimt's permanent exhibition, seemed so happy and beautiful especially when compared to the previous halls Schiele and Kokoschka. And here is dark, the work is not highlighted, but these photos are black and white - all fused into one gray mass. By the way, watch Klimt quickly bored, beautifully and intricately repeated. From Schiele and Kokoschka first impression was - the horror, but eventually something else could see me now and they are interesting.

[Meister]

amazing ... can be a feeling from that show poorly made? I even when alone saw the work of Klimt, they liked me

[fross]

Сообщение от Meister

amazing ... can be a feeling from that show poorly made? I even when alone saw the work of Klimt, I liked it

It is possible that the case in the exhibition. There, except the hall Klimt and the hall with posters of two rooms: one with the layout of the exhibition hall in 1908 and another with a mockup of a wooden dollhouse and theatrical sketches. Well along a long corridor hung with the work. But I do not remember anything that would want to remember. Yes, and Klimt is better when one looks at the work of all the exhibition, when he was a Hall - is the problem is something to select. As if one job was cut to pieces.

[Meister]

still very much like and Klimt, and Van Gogh's see ... I envy you fross, (the white of course)

[fross]

Сообщение от Meister

is still very much like and Klimt, and Van Gogh's see ... I envy you fross, (the white of course)

Klimt's sake do not advise, but Van Gogh is worth it: Austrian Airlines flight from Moscow, about 5 am, the whole day there, home at night. Directory of Van Gogh weighs two laptops, but I have brought, if not make it to the exhibition - Ladies look.

[Meister]

Сообщение от fross

catalog of Van Gogh weighs two laptops, but I have brought, if not make it to the exhibition - the ladies watch.

I catch the word))))

I have here at the weekend another poezdochka planned, if everything goes, be sure to tell)

[DSF]

Yes, and Klimt is better when one looks at the work of all the exhibition, when he was a Hall - is the problem is something to select. As if one job was cut to pieces.

Not every artist can hold a solo exhibition. In fact, the problem of diversity, sooner or later confronts every artist. Mastered a particular method or technique (can be a very interesting and original in itself), the artist begins his "exploit", especially if this method is like a buyer. As a result, the group exhibitions of his work look interesting in comparison with others, but if it works to bring together - monotonous. Great artists for this very watched and tried every effort to avoid this, sometimes even at the expense of wages and their own popularity. Contemporaries are often very surprised that the artist suddenly for no reason at all manner of changes, though, and so everything seems good, but critics later called it "periods" in art.