Wassily Kandinsky, the original? h 2 - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Toliy · 18-02-2015, 23:26

Good day! We would like to know your opinion on the film and how it was genuine.1. The picture was investigated (Artlab) using optical microscopy, digital microscopy, UV light with beams of wood, methods of IR reflectography, x-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF) and infrared spectroscopy with Fourier transform (FTIR). 2. Conclusion the MCA ( Ministry of culture of Ukraine).
First of all I would like to get an answer from the (a)active and as was stated by one of the participants (do Not cling to a straw. You have so many respected people expressed their opinions. This work is a direct road to the furnace! ) are from Respected people (Ukr) and how much they trust those who give to the examination ! Thank you

uriart · 18-02-2015, 23:38

Toliy, expertise in vain threw money!
None of these experts can't be trusted!
If not lying frankly, just wrong.
But the conclusion is one signature. And surname of the signatory no.
The paradox.

Маруся · 19-02-2015, 01:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Preston

seller a Question: since technology is already on hand, why not make art?

Apparently, the answer to this question will not be.

John Preston, no guessing! Here it is, on the principle of "get a fascist grenade!" (well, or Vice versa...)

Even the arguments under the numbers:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toliy

1. The picture was investigated (Artlab) using optical microscopy, digital microscopy, UV light with beams of wood, methods of IR reflectography, x-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF) and infrared spectroscopy with Fourier transform (FTIR). 2. Conclusion the MCA ( Ministry of culture of Ukraine).
First of all I would like to get an answer from the (a)active and as was stated by one of the participants (do Not cling to a straw. You have so many respected people expressed their opinions. This work is a direct road to the furnace! ) are from Respected people (Ukr) and how much they trust those who give to the examination ! Thanks

Dear, before to make this a Comedy in two acts (parts) for a start, you could ask:
- whether you discussed here "expertise" Artlab (the button "search")
However, even great, that even in this difficult time (judging by the date) organization finds strength and means for carrying out the amazing technological expertise
who here is afraid of the MCA ( Ministry of culture of Ukraine)"? Or "they" with some then became experts Kandinsky... ( Do it now, too - "Ukrainian avant-garde"?)

Well, if you are interested in the opinions active or not members of the forum that we should approach the question should be careful, just in case...
Or do You think that shows a piece of paper can change anything in the already repeatedly expressed the opinion?

P. S. the Picture has changed and thank God!

Toliy · 19-02-2015, 03:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Маруся

John Preston no guessing! Here it is, on the principle of "get a fascist grenade!" (well, or Vice versa...)

Even the arguments under the numbers:

Dear, before to make this a Comedy in two acts (parts) for a start, you could ask:
- whether you discussed here "expertise" Artlab (the button "search")
However, even great, that even in this difficult time (judging by the date) organization finds strength and means for carrying out the amazing technological expertise
who here is afraid of the MCA ( Ministry of culture of Ukraine)"? Or "they" with some then became experts Kandinsky... ( Do it now, too - "Ukrainian avant-garde"?)

Well, if you are interested in the opinions active or not members of the forum that we should approach the question should be careful, just in case...
Or do You think that shows a piece of paper can change anything in the already repeatedly expressed the opinion?

P. S. the Picture has changed and thank God!

Dear Mary , please carefully !

Toliy · 19-02-2015, 03:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by uriart

Toliy, expertise in vain threw money!
None of these experts can't be trusted!
If not lying frankly, just wrong.
But the conclusion is one signature. And surname of the signatory no.
The paradox, Yes.

Yuri! Thank You and Your followers

uriart · 19-02-2015, 08:24

Toliy, no thanks!
Why so harsh words about Kiev experts?
Yes because they are not in Kiev.
There are a certain number of people writing to say expertise. And not more.
But why are their so to speak examination?
Only that money which you have paid. And further, these leaves with texts and seals zero!!! And no knowledgeable person can't believe in these papers! Anywhere!
Believe me, I know what I'm saying! Have bitter experience of such pseudoexperiment.
Only sorry its a waste of money.
Judging by how you believe all these papers, you are a new person in this market. And still don't know what these papers anywhere and nobody seriously considered.
Nothing! Peabodies! Eat buds and get your experience.
You must understand one thing. The work of this name does not is positioned in such organizations. This is the case if you had the original.
And this dressing clean water! Brought from somewhere out abroad in the hope that Ukraine will find a sucker who will fork out the money!!!

18-02-2015, 23:26	Original language: Russian #1
Toliy Новичок Join Date: Feb 2015 Posts: 18 Thanks: 22 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post Reputation: 2	Wassily Kandinsky, the original? h 2 Good day! We would like to know your opinion on the film and how it was genuine.1. The picture was investigated (Artlab) using optical microscopy, digital microscopy, UV light with beams of wood, methods of IR reflectography, x-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF) and infrared spectroscopy with Fourier transform (FTIR). 2. Conclusion the MCA ( Ministry of culture of Ukraine). First of all I would like to get an answer from the (a)active and as was stated by one of the participants (do Not cling to a straw. You have so many respected people expressed their opinions. This work is a direct road to the furnace! ) are from Respected people (Ukr) and how much they trust those who give to the examination ! Thank you Attached Thumbnails

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Wassily Kandinsky, the original?	Toliy	Costs, valuation, attribution	100	06-03-2015 17:26
December 16 was born Wassily Kandinsky	Santa	Chatter	1	16-12-2011 12:04
Guggenheim Museum retrospective suit Wassily Kandinsky	SergeiSK	Art Kaleidoscope	0	02-09-2009 16:52
Wassily Kandinsky exhibition at the Pompidou Center	fross	Exhibitions and events	15	16-04-2009 02:26
A rare work of Wassily Kandinsky at Christie's	Евгений	Auctions	4	22-09-2008 13:53

18-02-2015, 23:38	Original language: Russian #2
uriart Banned Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: UKRAINE Posts: 8,039 Thanks: 5,979 Thanked 7,016 Times in 2,462 Posts Reputation: 12460	Toliy, expertise in vain threw money! None of these experts can't be trusted! If not lying frankly, just wrong. But the conclusion is one signature. And surname of the signatory no. The paradox.

19-02-2015, 08:24	Original language: Russian #6
uriart Banned Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: UKRAINE Posts: 8,039 Thanks: 5,979 Thanked 7,016 Times in 2,462 Posts Reputation: 12460	Toliy, no thanks! Why so harsh words about Kiev experts? Yes because they are not in Kiev. There are a certain number of people writing to say expertise. And not more. But why are their so to speak examination? Only that money which you have paid. And further, these leaves with texts and seals zero!!! And no knowledgeable person can't believe in these papers! Anywhere! Believe me, I know what I'm saying! Have bitter experience of such pseudoexperiment. Only sorry its a waste of money. Judging by how you believe all these papers, you are a new person in this market. And still don't know what these papers anywhere and nobody seriously considered. Nothing! Peabodies! Eat buds and get your experience. You must understand one thing. The work of this name does not is positioned in such organizations. This is the case if you had the original. And this dressing clean water! Brought from somewhere out abroad in the hope that Ukraine will find a sucker who will fork out the money!!!