|
English | Русский | ![]() |
Регистрация | Дневники | Справка | Пользователи | Поиск | Сообщения за день | Все разделы прочитаны |
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
![]() |
Язык оригинала: Русский #1 |
Banned
Регистрация: 23.03.2010
Адрес: Україна
Сообщений: 241
Спасибо: 959
Поблагодарили 189 раз(а) в 92 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 9
Репутация: 380
|
![]()
Recently (on 40godov the last century to the present) in the history of painting was put enormous amount of material extracted with the help of stylistic kritiki.Zhivopisi so many that do not neatly ask what is notable for one or other manner of images, what is the originality of a style ( After all, look at the picture completely elementarnuyu .. and she is considered a masterpiece, not it possible that just because the artist decided to put the first such product
on display? a picture that looks completely drawn by a child with no talent .. best describes "as an artist (who in real images has never tried to draw something) - such a genius ... so I decided to engage the subject in which I hope to enlighten me the best minds gathered here on the forum. WHY A BAD Draw Considered masterpiece? Sincerely Yurko <!--~ a ~-->. |
![]() |
![]() |
Опции темы | |
Опции просмотра | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Тема | Автор | Разделы | Ответов | Последние сообщения |
Attribution and evaluation of paintings | Runar | Costs, valuation, attribution | 1 | 25.03.2010 10:31 |
Assessment, the attribution of paintings Bodarevsky | ФАЛЕСИК | Costs, valuation, attribution | 10 | 12.02.2010 17:14 |
Help attribution of the author of paintings | artman | Costs, valuation, attribution | 18 | 13.12.2009 13:59 |
Baroque, the attribution of paintings | Alex82 | Costs, valuation, attribution | 2 | 03.12.2009 18:20 |
Help in the attribution of paintings | Бирюза | Costs, valuation, attribution | 9 | 25.11.2009 00:27 |
|