Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 06.03.2010, 15:54 Язык оригинала: Русский       #14
Гуру
 
Аватар для Veronic
 
Регистрация: 17.12.2008
Адрес: Украина Мукачево, Венгрия Хевиз
Сообщений: 2,165
Спасибо: 1,793
Поблагодарили 1,718 раз(а) в 574 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 4
Репутация: 2879
Отправить сообщение для Veronic с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

By the way, the law in this situation is absolutely not on the side of the Belgian collector. Generally, in this case we obtain two paintings. One (who moved) by an unknown author, and the second (which is exported) Bryullov, and here the law prohibits the export of cultural goods, or am I mistaken? In this situation it would be difficult to prove that it is not, even pictures will not help. I remember back in Soviet times it was possible to bring through customs one product, but under the Declaration to introduce similar.

In this situation we can assume malice. If the picture was not Bryullov, so there could be skipped, as well .... Hardly.

Eugene, keep abreast of the process. I wonder what it would be.




Последний раз редактировалось Veronic; 06.03.2010 в 16:01.
Veronic вне форума   Ответить с цитированием