I fully agree with
Mr y, that before you buy must thoroughly examine the work and not to believe without taking examination. I explain what my claim to art-consulting, pre-make a small digression:
Цитата:
Сообщение от Art Consulting
buy, then that would put someone on the money, this is fraud, and in this case the money you certainly do not get)
|
You know, we here all decent people and work with the art is clearly not for the sake of someone "put the money."
Now the very explanation: Art Consulting advertises its expertise (especially technology), using a very important argument: The responsibility for their mistake is insured for a certain number of millions. This appears to be a huge advantage, which provide neither the funds nor the expertise of the museum, or the heirs. Finding your way in some works extremely hard, and technological expertise can sometimes provide invaluable assistance. Art Consulting argues that those. examination virtually sinless, that, however, refuted the practice.
Not all have a good knowledge in art and time to obtain them. Insurance liability expert seems to be avoiding some problems. It turns out that Art Consulting is responsible for the fact that it is real or fake money, and my main claim is just that, get the money in which case it is impossible. Let us give another example:
I bought the work of a famous artist 30-ies on the western auction, brought her here, gave those expert in the art-consulting services, as well as on the composite, the question is no. A verdict of Art consulting it false, as was done in 50-ies. If I believe in art consulting, I'd have to take her back to the auction and try to get it. My loss in this case: transportation, insurance, appraisals, but I got rid of the fake stuff. However, I decided that I do not trust art-consulting and drove her to the West recognized worldwide expert on the artist (on the forum earlier cited example of this situation in real life). The expert recognizes the work of this and then my losses look different: round-trip transportation, insurance, examination of the art consulting. And if I had passed the thing on the auction, the "undrawn profit" from a possible resale in the future. And to compensate the losses incurred due to faulty Art consulting impossible, since can not be proved in court. Here I talk about. Let the art-making consulting expertise, it is necessary market, please do not mislead people, that in case of failure thereof, the organization they will be able to recoup their losses. By the way as another example: I bought the work at auction, brought her here, made the examination in art consulting, has concluded that it is real, it povisela at my home 5 years and then I decided to sell it, find that it is a fake. Return to the auction can not, because possibility of a return period is over. Here me back my cost of this work through the courts because of errors Artkonsaltinga would be impossible. Let them do their expertise, but people must understand that this is also
IS AT YOUR OWN RISK