Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 13.02.2010, 16:16 Язык оригинала: Русский       #245
Гуру
 
Аватар для Pavel
 
Регистрация: 13.02.2009
Сообщений: 7,384
Спасибо: 3,976
Поблагодарили 4,028 раз(а) в 1,687 сообщениях
Репутация: -2
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Berth Посмотреть сообщение
It's not that critics can not do it professionally.
The fact that the artists really better listen to other artists. This is especially true artists are not very young. There, for forty. Rather, even at fifty.
The relationship of artists to forty such that the judgments, they do not want to hear because of some jealousy, and listen there is not something special. Senior did not want to because little or no little /envy them, afraid of total carping, and irrational.

But art, in the bulk, and the truth to say anything sensible can not. Elderly do not want to (hurt, they are lazy, etc.). The young can not. Art Technology in universities were poorly taught recently and the day to devote to the development of artistic skills have stopped - had taken to the usual art school - to write, just like real artists the whole day a week, Pts. useful way.

Art Critic, which is necessary - to understand what they do - go to workshops.
 The All-around to this understanding if you want you can learn just for artists. It would be a desire.
I am not one of them drove. Well, I am a third year and worked as director of exhibitions at the House of the artist .
The analysis is done not for the artist. The analysis determines the value of the artist. If you are trading then you know how much more valuable than the original painting. People are paying money for it.



Pavel вне форума   Ответить с цитированием