[public]

Сообщение от Fed

You are a lucky man. I see here only outrageous inability, who studied the artist. If you see the good in this, the real work you do should lead to ecstasy.

Thank you, I'm really happy man. The fact that these work, I deal exclusively with the position of contemporary art, where, in fact, painting is not as important as the idea itself. The idea Shubin - is narcissism raised to the cult of personality. All that was happening to her - all worthy of its attention and the viewer. Here we are concerned not so much a woman's mark on the painting (so-called women's painting), but the woman in the painting. As you know, the theme of the role of women in art is relevant.

Yes, I was really really good work resulted in ecstasy - it's true. And I excite the idea that these works can be with me. I do not want to brag, but some of those whom I admire, yet I have

Added after 13 minutes

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I can, but I was the topic was somehow not invited to speak about these young artists and, in his opinion, provocative. And others, too, as I remember ...
He undertook to show their work. In his opinion, deserving of attention.
I look at them and myself for this to work, though not large, perhaps, thank you.
And who really believe, and from watching what things come into ecstasy I will not. Or is it a discussion you call it?
And the theme of Opening of the exhibition RESTART in Odessa is not the first, which discusses the work of Ukrainian contemporary authors.
For example, Masha Shubina dedicated an entire issue Masha Shubina:
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...B8%D0%BD%D0%B0
And so on for many young Ukrainian authors.

Cyril, the fact of the matter is that I would like to know the opinion of everyone who is interested in contemporary art. Since you are in the subject, and to the same guru, the best of all I would be interested to hear your opinion about the Ukrainian authors and about the Ukrainian art in general. It would be kind of you, if you laid out the work of those authors who you personally like

Added after 34 minutes

Сообщение от Fed

You are not thinking about communications opponent - my view was expressed above: "I see here only outrageous inability, who studied the artist."
   "Why do you my opinion - you have entered the debate, which involves saying any kind of opinion. Moreover, the presented work is only interested in the mind for the game to discuss them.

I have long tried to understand this dislike for the artist. I have two options:

1. Her dislike our colleagues for her marketing;
2. Her fans disliked the traditional school of painting.

Which option you can include, Fed? If neither one of them, please describe why it is you do not like? I repeat: I have not once thought about why she might not like it, so I'm interested in this phenomenon.

Добавлено через 1 час 3 минуты
Young and promising