Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky
Here's an interesting thought A. Erofeev on this subject:
I think that we are too fixated on these national and zest need to move on to another roll, this time without zest. Simply, in my opinion, we must return to the understanding that art, above all, this is a common human activity and discusses the problems she is not a national identity, and some deeper problems. Of course, this does not exclude any specific national. But this is not the main thing in art.
|
This is not the main thing in art, but I think the art of great artists are always nationally. When these traits can be expressed both directly and indirectly. The problem lies elsewhere. Just the artists are forced to sit on two chairs. Or go by hook or by crook. Until there is support for the idea of the state, foundations and individuals, nothing will change.
Particularly dramatic fate of art in the regions. So I think that once these unfavorable forecasts for the idea of regional galleries - this is strange. The idea of the noble. Consciousness suddenly and immediately not change. And any activity over time brings results.
Even if the stupid every day to sit and sharpen the black and white pencil on the number of their good deeds and sins, and by the end of life will be as thoughtful.
And the activities of the gallery in our environment is still and always contribute to the development of culture.
Where did they take, the artists with a sense of responsibility for world problems, if not the cultural environment in which to grow and develop? We have a couple of years ago, quite seriously rumors that roam the top of the idea that it was time to close the department of painting and graphics, as well as their zero profit proizvodstvu.K Fortunately, further speculation is not gone.