Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 09.10.2008, 16:07 Язык оригинала: Русский       #128
Гуру
 
Аватар для LCR
 
Регистрация: 29.04.2008
Адрес: Париж
Сообщений: 6,211
Спасибо: 18,677
Поблагодарили 38,263 раз(а) в 5,446 сообщениях
Репутация: 29883
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от artcol Посмотреть сообщение
add:
even among professionals and blinkers mb - personal biases /antagonism, relationships, etc.
But this is the problem of buyers.
There is not only personal preferences, but some general setting, and it becomes a problem not only buyers.
Give very specific example. Two years ago, I arranged an exhibition of works of my husband in a Paris gallery - not the last, even if lately it is not as active as before. It was a shortened version of the exhibition, held at the NCCA in 2005 at the first Biennale, and received excellent press.

On opening day there were many specialized journalists, I was surprised and happy (there are galleries, which critics never go, in fact, these galleries is just the majority), and most importantly, I saw that they really like it, honestly.

Home I left happy and waited. All week, bought newspapers - nothing. I called galereyschitse, said she did not understand, because they liked what she had said that there was nothing unusual in this, "they'll never write about has not yet advanced artists, where they saw for the first time."
As you can see, a vicious circle
So, the question arises is: how the public can generally know about the artist?



LCR вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 6 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо LCR за это полезное сообщение:
artspb (27.07.2015), DSF (09.10.2008), Glasha (09.10.2008), sur (13.03.2010), Zenia (09.10.2008), Евгений (09.10.2008)