Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 01.10.2008, 23:01 Язык оригинала: Русский       #10
Гуру
 
Аватар для LCR
 
Регистрация: 29.04.2008
Адрес: Париж
Сообщений: 6,211
Спасибо: 18,677
Поблагодарили 38,263 раз(а) в 5,446 сообщениях
Репутация: 29883
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Samvel Посмотреть сообщение
at the expense of what you have there all measured, and quietly, without fuss etc., I am more than confident that nothing more or less meaningful it does not happen, there can speak the past, because the future is not there. In any case, even though I say that I'm sure I'm sure the same somnevayus.prosto we are talking nothing personal. Ask yourself why in the days of the USSR-flourishing culture, and examples of mass. Whether it's theater, cinema, zhivopis.i.t.d Why is there such artists as Filonov, Bakst, why not by producer as Paradjanov, or Tarkovsky, theatergoers as Stanislavsky, Meerhold, poets like Mandelstam and Brodsky. Wash Brodsky said .. \ Empire gave rise to culture and democracy paper. There were cultural people, but people of culture are no more.
I can not agree with what you say. How much of one or M. Brodsky was abominable, the untalented waste paper, on one or Falk Shterenberg - tons of hideous scribble on one of Prokofiev and Shostakovich - millions Dunaevskii and Khrennikov?

The fact that democracy can not produce art - also, in my opinion, true.
Can you talk about Paradzhanov and Tarkovsky, but did not mention Visconti, Antonioni, Fellini, Truffaut and Godard (I do not like movies, but even I can see that it works now, a very high level).

Bakst - which, incidentally, to the Soviet Union had absolutely nothing to do - a wonderful artist, but Hopper, from my point of view, much more significant. Georgia O'Keefe also spent her life in his native America. I can not even speak of abstract expressionism, etc.

And in Europe, too, can not say that was a complete void. It is European art defined artistic image of the twentieth century, especially 1-st half of it: Chirico, Matisse, Bonnard, Rouault, de Stael, Marc, Dubuffet, Morandi (I only mention your favorite, or should be called and Picasso, and Dali, and Leger), Bacon, in the end, Hockney - but you in one sentence all that crosses?
Aphorism Brodsky, and indeed all the aphorisms (besides, of course, that I have just led to another story) beautiful and funny, but essentially wrong - like any simplification.

But no hard feelings, eh? : p



LCR вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 10 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо LCR за это полезное сообщение:
AlexanderG (02.10.2008), AlexYatskevich (31.10.2010), artcol (02.10.2008), artspb (26.07.2015), Grigory (02.10.2008), iosif (02.10.2008), KaterinaMN (29.04.2010), адамович (12.08.2009), Кирилл Сызранский (01.10.2008), Фред (22.11.2008)