Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство - Показать сообщение отдельно

Черномашенцев Владимир · 28.07.2009, 11:46

I repeat to myself that I, as one of the Chukchi jokes. "Chukcha - not the reader, Chukchi - a writer." Hobbies I have this - to write. But when will be quite bad with the business, I can easily earn money on the writings for magazines. The more a hobby - the easier it is to live.

I - a godsend for this site. I will soon be paid a salary, if I do not get bored with a dozen other regular characters-Forum. Who else can write a readable text? Not boring to see the tongue-tied messages to two or three lines, of which half - a quotation? Or simply torn from the network reprints of student course work in art, which in turn were once written off with the text "times of Azov"? Or online encyclopedias. However, today's youth do not read. As the same Chukchi.

But back to Rothko, forget it about me.

Slightly above, I see people like that look Rothko in the State Tretyakov Gallery in the original. And not happy with his work.

Here are the opinions of another section of the forum:

http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=31205

There is, and photos and reviews. Somehow some compares with Rothko Amer. Wallpapers - probably because of the large size. Remembering the Soviet anecdote, that the newspaper "Truth" should be immediately printed on soft paper in rulanah, we can paraphrase unknown classics - and Rothko must be printed in rolls. But the wallpaper.

All reviewers had seen the "Lenin" - at best neutral. Do not want to talk about women's tastes, but it is clear that Rothko is impressive only vulnerable female psyche. In fact, it seems, is impressive not for their own paintings Rothko, advertising and the declared price.

Again:

My personal opinion is totally against what is called Amer. art. I call it - Amer. design. Evidently, I grew up and was educated in the Old World. And I was totally drawn to America. Somehow I close red Petrov-Vodkin to GTG than red Rothko at MoMA.

Again, do not think it necessary to waste precious space on a separate forum post, so answer the lowest subscriber, that is my personal opinion on what constitutes real art, he has read yesterday in another section of the site - I do not want to be repeated:

http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...45&page=13

But then again "gurus" would be to scold me for repetition.

28.07.2009, 11:46	Язык оригинала: Русский #110
Черномашенцев Владимир Banned Регистрация: 25.07.2009 Адрес: Россия, Москва Сообщений: 875 Спасибо: 1,092 Поблагодарили 1,381 раз(а) в 500 сообщениях Записей в дневнике: 12 Репутация: 2191	"Alas, the talent - not the brother of brevity." Chernomashentsev VV I repeat to myself that I, as one of the Chukchi jokes. "Chukcha - not the reader, Chukchi - a writer." Hobbies I have this - to write. But when will be quite bad with the business, I can easily earn money on the writings for magazines. The more a hobby - the easier it is to live. I - a godsend for this site. I will soon be paid a salary, if I do not get bored with a dozen other regular characters-Forum. Who else can write a readable text? Not boring to see the tongue-tied messages to two or three lines, of which half - a quotation? Or simply torn from the network reprints of student course work in art, which in turn were once written off with the text "times of Azov"? Or online encyclopedias. However, today's youth do not read. As the same Chukchi. But back to Rothko, forget it about me. Slightly above, I see people like that look Rothko in the State Tretyakov Gallery in the original. And not happy with his work. Here are the opinions of another section of the forum: http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=31205 There is, and photos and reviews. Somehow some compares with Rothko Amer. Wallpapers - probably because of the large size. Remembering the Soviet anecdote, that the newspaper "Truth" should be immediately printed on soft paper in rulanah, we can paraphrase unknown classics - and Rothko must be printed in rolls. But the wallpaper. All reviewers had seen the "Lenin" - at best neutral. Do not want to talk about women's tastes, but it is clear that Rothko is impressive only vulnerable female psyche. In fact, it seems, is impressive not for their own paintings Rothko, advertising and the declared price. Again: My personal opinion is totally against what is called Amer. art. I call it - Amer. design. Evidently, I grew up and was educated in the Old World. And I was totally drawn to America. Somehow I close red Petrov-Vodkin to GTG than red Rothko at MoMA. Again, do not think it necessary to waste precious space on a separate forum post, so answer the lowest subscriber, that is my personal opinion on what constitutes real art, he has read yesterday in another section of the site - I do not want to be repeated: http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...45&page=13 But then again "gurus" would be to scold me for repetition.