[fross]

Сообщение от LCR

I'm still here is what I want to ask (I touched your words, though): I will not breed nepotism, but here, for example, Vladimir Yakovlev. His parents sold his work on the 5-7-9 district., Depending on the size. Lived nevertheless not rich - pictures are not sold every day, at least until the end of 70 years ..
Hence, Volodya was a weakling, could not. And now his work sells for 20,000 euros and more. So now he posthumously in strongman raised himself, it turns out? And what about your prediction, which he did should never be?
You know, God forbid artists with whom you communicate, "self-sufficient", "in which all is" to write, as Yakovlev.

For fun: at what point Soutine, Steel, many others have ceased to be bad artists and become good - in the same one where Dr. Barnes and Jacques Dyubur discharged them the first check? Once you're able to tumble, you can not find?

The question really is not simple. It turns out to live in prosperity can only be indulging the tastes of existing customers, but to make history, but creating something new that should change these preferences, and therefore has negligible chance of being well paid.