Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 12.11.2021, 00:29 Язык оригинала: Русский       #8
Новичок
 
Регистрация: 18.03.2010
Сообщений: 24
Спасибо: 1
Поблагодарили 2 раз(а) в 2 сообщениях
Репутация: 4
По умолчанию

[QUOTE=olnev;1405002]russophile, is an icon rather mediocre.
Weak.
Normal.

In such cases, restoration of the full program (full cycle) is not justified.


These icons can be partially restore: to clear the pollution and conserve.
If you want to tell you more.
Can the English?
Please know there was never any intention to mislead anyone. In an exercise of discovery, this is not an icon. It is a late 18th early 19th Century Neoclassical painting. It is expertly painted. Any adornment was added after completion and then removed long ago. No matter the expert, I have learned scientific examination is necessary for true professional examination. The human eye sees 380-750nm in spectrum. Science sees (>1mm-10 to the -12 power m). So many answers to construction and authorship exist outside our visual range. Whether in America or Russia or anywhere is a professional experts opinion truly professional without science to validate it?



russophile вне форума   Ответить с цитированием