Цитата:
Сообщение от Semen Semenovich
Actually, this refers to degenerative. And his concept of art I have already given above. For me - is the highest distinction of creativity, based on professionalism. Examples:
music - Tchaikovsky, Paganini ...; Painting - Renoir, Serov ...; theater - E. Evstigneev, EV Mironov ...; film - Tarkovsky, S. Bondarchuk, etc.
Also is the art of games - Zidane (football), Barbakaru (maps), O'Neal (basketball )....
Also Suvorov, Zhukov (the art of warfare ).... Well, in that spirit ...
|
On the Internet I found more than a hundred different definitions. The problem is that the concept is very multifaceted and captures the entire scope of material and spiritual life. And because each such definition reflects only a certain facet of this polyhedron, but the very same concept of art remains very uncertain. In order to understand that deeper and bigger in this concept - we must take this polyhedron and to consider it from different sides. And somewhere in the depths of this structure, you're bound to see and work degenerates. Take for example mentioned in the beginning of the theme of Hirst. Few had read about him, saw little of his work. As I understand the artist went to the eternal questions of life and death as the ideal modern society: the question of life - is a matter of what medicine to take and the deification of medicine. This idea is seen in his works. A sort of a grotesque in contemporary society. Dead animals (torn cow, animals in formaldehyde) - does not say whether it is about our attitude and did not have to revise at least the personal attitude to this. For example, becoming vegatariantsem, save the lives of at least one cow. So that in order to understand the meaning of what is happening and is the art of Hirst, and therefore it is art. Vazmozhno there and there is degeneration. And is not adjacent to the genius of madness, degeneration? The distinction that is hard to find, it is vague as the concept of art itself, but that would know what real art should know and his dark side. This may not be the only product of degenerates. It may just be someone else's faith, a different view, a strange sight - all faces of humanity, its psychology, its devices, the devices of his soul. And this is the brink of art. To understand the world should know about the existence of darkness. Philosophers say: that to understand the good must exist necessarily evil. Let me add: that to understand the genius to be aware that this madness. Not in vain there aphorism "Brilliant idea, but rather whether it is crazy that would be true?" (I can not vouch for verbatim but the meaning of this). You look at the art of the one, though beautiful, hand, and it is multifaceted in its manifestations. No limits creativity as there are no limits and for those who engaged in them (for degenerates included). My boundaries between art and blundering I have outlined: good and evil, genius and madness