Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 30.07.2008, 14:40 Язык оригинала: Русский       #30
Гуру
 
Аватар для Vladimir
 
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,448 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23529
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR Посмотреть сообщение
of which are expensive and there is no reason to consider them undervalued. Particularly successful mature abstractions de Stael art galleries on the market can cost 1,5-3 million dollars.

That is 29 times cheaper than Fresis Bacon.
At 8.5 times cheaper than Jeff Koons.
At 6 times cheaper than Jasper Johns.
And - to think that the humiliation is no limit - 2 times cheaper than Kabakov!


You understand: I absolutely, categorically disagrees with the assertion that "there is no reason to de Stael undervalued"
Well, pounced Just art in 2006, since then much water has flowed under the bridge. And much de Stael 3 million utek finally and irrevocably. In two years at least have doubled. Kabakov's work with the record de Stael could still "pobodatsya. But keep in mind that Kabakov registered so far only one such vyskokaya sale at auction - $ 6 million for a de Stael art galleries on the market is already an ordinary case. Qwerty, right? Progshnoz - prices for outstanding work in the short term can go up to 8-10 million dollars so that the de Stael could not survive. As for any decent artist.

De Stael I genuinely like, but compared with Bacon - not the eagle. Moreover, Bacon - artist of mass popularity, taken away on slogans, such as poppy as Warhol, Mondrian, Picasso, Haring. A de Stael - it's more fun for intellectuals. The name is not so loud.

I looked at the portraits de Stael published by LCR. However, in Pasternak like? Or think?



Vladimir вне форума   Ответить с цитированием