Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 31.03.2009, 13:06 Язык оригинала: Русский       #10
Пользователь
 
Регистрация: 28.03.2009
Сообщений: 82
Спасибо: 27
Поблагодарили 11 раз(а) в 6 сообщениях
Репутация: 19
По умолчанию

Evaluate or give an opinion on reproduction or on the monitor screen paintings unacceptable. But the fact that this work has no relation to the Russian school of painting - this is so visible. And if you pay attention to the manner of registration of hair, coat, hands, face, it is safe to say that it is fictional, a composite image, and apparently counterfeit of a masterpiece. The composition and anatomy suggests that it was not written with nature. This is reflected also flashing on his face. I felt unprofessional use of white, that in the Russian school of painting is unacceptable. But it's all empty talk, need examination. You're hoping to sell it as a masterpiece of the Russian school of painting?



Vechnost вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Vechnost за это полезное сообщение:
Ninni (08.05.2009)