Цитата:
Сообщение от Tit
Allow a few words from a fan, not burdened with neither the experience nor the theory ...
I think it is not correct to compare video art and painting in general. This is a different kind of art, using other means and pursuing other goals.
I would say that the pictures add time. It is more akin to cinema and photography. And the means and objectives of the impact on the viewer.
Actually, to my untrained opinion, no need to compare the actual, conceptual iskkusstvo, video art with painting.
At some stage of development (or degradation) of their paths diverged.
It's like comparing music and poetry.
|
Already regretted that said Fross. I went to an understanding of video art from painting, rather than from photography. On the professional lecture about it is not claimed, but simply wrote their ideas for Fross. Think I certainly can not, despite the fact that someone thinks otherwise. Maybe you drill the definition of video art for more than "a different kind of art, using other means and pursuing other goals? For sim removed, because long realized that it is ungrateful (to express my thoughts here). Always someone easier potseplyatsya for words, say something "is not correct," than to write your answer to someone's question!
PS: The Art of Bill Viola and Wood - not conceptual (if understood by the "conceptualism" 2nd floor 20 at. In the West), and not actual (if by this we understand the topic, most acutely reflected the spirit of time). It is - timeless (judging by the subjects). I spoke only about him, not about the video-arte at all.