Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 03.03.2009, 13:17 Язык оригинала: Русский       #24
Авторитет
 
Аватар для Art-lover
 
Регистрация: 25.10.2008
Адрес: Киев
Сообщений: 825
Спасибо: 1,587
Поблагодарили 2,452 раз(а) в 384 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 2
Репутация: 3846
По умолчанию

Munch, let us cite one another so as to avoid collapsing context:

Цитата:
Сообщение от Art-lover Посмотреть сообщение
We are interested mostly the latter, the theoretical aspect. That is, he gives us hope to find out who the artists and to what extent involved in surrealism, no relying on statements by the artists themselves or third parties.
Цитата:
Сообщение от Munk Посмотреть сообщение
Since we are talking about fine art, then I would suggest not to move toward the concepts and intentions, about which we can write the volume, and in the direction of the stylistic features or methods of the masters of art - and try to find this direction of combining the features that characterize Surrealism as a direction in painting.
I tried a lot of material on condensed to a few messages - so it was interesting and not tedious. The theory is useful to us to get away from fruitless disputes and seeking what is not. For example, surrealism, like schools.
To all these arguments and are going to come back to the artists and view their work with fresh eyes.



Art-lover вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 3 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Art-lover за это полезное сообщение:
LCR (05.03.2009), Мунк (04.03.2009), ранжер (26.03.2009)