Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 03.03.2009, 10:10 Язык оригинала: Русский       #23
Местный
 
Аватар для Мунк
 
Регистрация: 09.07.2008
Сообщений: 238
Спасибо: 228
Поблагодарили 374 раз(а) в 92 сообщениях
Репутация: 421
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Art-lover Посмотреть сообщение
Where do go from here?
Apparently, surrealism too contradictory phenomenon, and can not be clearly defined.
From the well-known stretch of the imagination it can be considered in a concrete historical terms - as a set of events and phenomena associated with the leaders of the surrealism movement surrealist, but in the theoretical aspect - as a probability space (or field) concepts and intentions, declared in the texts of the movement leaders and /or manifested in practice, these leaders recognized as surreal.
(Taki egg!: P)

We will be interested mostly the latter, the theoretical aspect. [/SPOILER]
Since we are talking about fine art, then I would suggest not to move toward the concepts and intentions, about which we can write the volume, and in the direction of the stylistic features or methods of the masters of art - and try to find in this area combine the features that characterize Surrealism as a trend in painting.



Мунк вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Мунк за это полезное сообщение:
Meister (03.03.2009)