Тема: Abstract forever
Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 07.04.2011, 15:33 Язык оригинала: Русский       #278
Авторитет
 
Аватар для Art-lover
 
Регистрация: 25.10.2008
Адрес: Киев
Сообщений: 825
Спасибо: 1,587
Поблагодарили 2,452 раз(а) в 384 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 2
Репутация: 3846
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от fabosch Посмотреть сообщение
throw nonsense Yan wider
Beautifully said. Only in the language of poetry and we can talk about painting.
Or - when there is no gift of versification - on surzhik metaphors.

Цитата:
Сообщение от Guriev, Igor Посмотреть сообщение
What people are ashamed to put "Senka" because he wants to hunger ONE "TRUTH" ...
...
Most uzhasTnoe - it popytatstso form a united opinion naschot art.
Senka you for PLURALIZM
A large Glasha Senka for suralizm:
Цитата:
Сообщение от Glasha Посмотреть сообщение
A similar story for me with surrealism. No matter how to deploy, or expand, or deepen - no. At Daly did not want to watch. Who would not convince me.
Do not look at Dali - take a look around:
And near and far - surreal terms. ))

Цитата:
Сообщение от DSF Посмотреть сообщение
Here is a practical dilemma. On the one hand, the abstractionist painter simplifies the form, ie, operates more or less simple geometric designs and markings.
Читать дальше... 
This allows you to concentrate on color. Discarding all that call volume, perspective, light and shade, "performance", "Contouring", etc. This greatly facilitates and simplifies the job - no need to worry about a zillion things. At first, it's very nice, you feel right yet physical pleasure - how great that one should not draw any ear ...

On the other hand, after a while you start to experience difficulties. The soul requires diversity and abstract artist pushes a fairly narrow framework. The result is a feeling that you walk in a circle, repeating the same thing over and over again.

And here is us and helps to "associative abstraction. We, like, again, did not bother (ears we draw all the same is not necessary), but at the same time, a little diversity and complexity of work, adding a hint of "image". Many artists have successfully balance on this face.
On my system, the definitions of this scheme is not abstract, but abstraktoidnoy painting.
Abstract paintings arise by virtue of an inner necessity - when the need arises from the artist ("reason" in the terminology Gurieva) to express the complex image, for which the figurative is neorganichnym. What is already here, "simplify" the artist's life - the ultimate sophistication.
All this applies to the "associative abstraction": a measure of success in this area is not at all have been holding a line production for profit "abstraktikov" with a hint of the subject.

Цитата:
Сообщение от artcol; 1589283"
To paraphrase: theoretical physicist, oversimplifies the realities, that is, operates more or less simple concepts and notions. This allows us to concentrate on your core. Well, etc. But the engineer must consider many things of the physical world: friction, material properties, etc. But the progress of a move first.
Interesting image, but I would elaborate. "Real" abstractionist "is a theoretical physicist and engineer, experimenter rolled into one. Two words - Nikola Tesla.

Цитата:
Сообщение от fabosch; 1584673"
... not look at it even now at this point - balancing between two worlds. As far as history is a common phenomenon - how many of these figures, where the tongue is hopelessly shakes about the numbers "0"? What do you think?
Be sure to tell you.



Art-lover вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 5 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Art-lover за это полезное сообщение:
DSF (07.04.2011), Glasha (07.04.2011), LCR (07.04.2011), Peter (07.04.2011), Игорь Гурьев (07.04.2011)