Цитата:
Сообщение от fabosch
if you say Comrade. Guryev, that Comrade. Vrubel was one step away from becoming the father of abstract art instead of the venerable Comrade. Kandinsky, I am afraid he is very upset for us and with the same enthusiasm will be a pioneer for Vrkbelya war, dragging the rope on their side
|
1) Black Bp
to on thewhitening not otmoesh white.
2) You never know who was one step away from his destruction.
Neither Matisse or Picasso did not abstraktivistami, although both younger than Kandinsky.
They just were not interested in this: try to imagine and portray who knows what.
Pick any topic: the room with Matisse, Picasso woman.
You so very much interested in what it is that or any other room or one or another woman?
Room and a woman - it is an occasion. Important - the transfiguration of genius and create an image from them.
And there is no way of Kandinsky, for the image - it is always an image of something.
So the abstract - art - ugly, which makes and ugly.
Enthusiasm about me too much.
You, comrade. Fabosh, I will forgive any liberties in advance and for all.
In my opinion, in abstractionism no one simple thing, but that very simple thing, which is one of the key elements without which there is no art: matter.
And the room, and a woman, and the flowers are merely a pretext for the artist.
What is the reason for abstraktivista?
Neto had this.
Anna Petrovna Kern was merely a pretext for Pushkin. Could be another reason.
But there is reason must always be.
And the reason it only gives the surrounding "reality."
Just do not about the music, this is a very special art form, when pure harmony and pure melodies condescend to the composer of the highest spheres ....